In the Peltier, Hay, and Drago (2005) article entitled "The Reflective Learning Continuum: Reflecting on Reflection," a reflective learning continuum was conceptualized and tested. This is a follow-up article based on three extensions: (1) determine whether the continuum could be expanded, (2) further validating the continuum using additional schools, and (3) determining whether the continuum could also be applied to undergraduate business education. The findings from a study of U.S. and UK students show that the revised scale is valid and reliable and that U.S. students in the sample universities rated their educational experience higher and were more likely to use reflective thinking practices.
2
INTRODUCTIONThe previous article in this issue of the Journal of Marketing Education (Peltier, Hay, and Drago, 2005) entitled "The Reflective Learning Continuum: Reflecting on Reflection," reviewed the reflective learning literature, conceptualized a reflective learning continuum, utilized an instrument to measure student learning along this continuum, and presented findings from an empirical study showing the validity and reliability of measures of reflective learning (and non-reflective learning) across the proposed continuum. Based on that research, the manuscript reviewers and JME editor recommended three extensions to consider: (1) determining whether the continuum could be expanded to include additional dimensions, (2) further validating the continuum using additional schools, and (3) determining whether the continuum could also be applied to undergraduate business education.This follow-up study is designed to further develop, test, and implement the reflective learning continuum on a global scale. Consistent with the recommended extensions, the article has three objectives. First, as with any continuum, some overlap exists at the intersection of various dimensions along that continuum. With this in mind, we expand the number of items in our reflection questionnaire for the purpose of better delineating dimensions along the reflective learning continuum. Second, partially in response to the business community and AACSB concerns for developing decision making skills in graduate students, our first manuscript validated the reflective learning instrument using a sample of recent alumni from an MBA program. Here, we take our revised continuum and examine whether reflective thinking is an important component of undergraduate business education. Because graduate and undergraduate students often exhibit disparate patterns of behaviours and learning approaches (Clarke and Flaherty, 2002), cross-validation across these two student populations is important. Third, 3 concerns surfaced regarding whether the validity of our reflective learning continuum was in any way compromised given that our initial study utilized students from a single U.S. university. To address this concern we validate our revised reflective learning continuum using undergraduate students in the U.S. and the United Kingdom. This approach has two bene...