1987
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90058-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trabecular bone density and loading history: Regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
238
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 456 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
238
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The SED ratio for the strut model was between 30.0 Bone volume fractions of 10, 20, and 30% were and 60.0 at 10% BV/TV and decreased to between The spherical void SED ratios were between 30.0 and 120.0 at 10% BV/TV and decreased to between 10.0 and 30.0 at 30% BV/TV. Since it is obvious that apparent SED will not represent the true tissue SED, some investigators have suggested using the apparent SED modified by the volume fraction to estimate the tissue SED (Carter et al, 1987;Huiskes et al, 1987). Dividing the apparent SED by the bone volume fraction will accurately predict the average hard tissue SED if two conditions are satisfied: (1) the exact apparent stiffness matrix was used to predict the apparent SED and (2) the stress in the marrow is negligible compared with the hard tissue stress.…”
Section: The Best Fits Between Predicted and Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The SED ratio for the strut model was between 30.0 Bone volume fractions of 10, 20, and 30% were and 60.0 at 10% BV/TV and decreased to between The spherical void SED ratios were between 30.0 and 120.0 at 10% BV/TV and decreased to between 10.0 and 30.0 at 30% BV/TV. Since it is obvious that apparent SED will not represent the true tissue SED, some investigators have suggested using the apparent SED modified by the volume fraction to estimate the tissue SED (Carter et al, 1987;Huiskes et al, 1987). Dividing the apparent SED by the bone volume fraction will accurately predict the average hard tissue SED if two conditions are satisfied: (1) the exact apparent stiffness matrix was used to predict the apparent SED and (2) the stress in the marrow is negligible compared with the hard tissue stress.…”
Section: The Best Fits Between Predicted and Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the trabecular microstructure (Goldstein, 1987;Snyder et al, 1989). Investigators have also stated that tissue stress estimates may be necessary to accurately quantify and predict mechanically adaptive trabecular bone remodeling (Carter et al, 1987;Cheal et al, 1987;Huiskes et al, 1987). These two factors suggest that microstructural analysis is needed to further our understanding of the mechanical and remodeling characteristics of trabecular bone.…”
Section: The Best Fits Between Predicted and Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since articular surface apposition and resultant contact force both vary appreciably throughout functional activities, however, conventional "snapshot" contact stress distributions at a specific instant of the duty cycle provide only limited information regarding the habitual mechano-stimulus at any given site. Appreciable precedent exists in the bone mechano-stimulus literature for including the effects of multiple loading configurations representative of dominant functional activities (Carter et al 1987;Adams et al 1996), although such work has involved prescribed external tractions rather than contact solutions. Therefore, a contact finite element formulation was specifically configured to address whole-duty-cycle joint surface engagement histories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skalak et al (1982) later formulated a continuum model of growth. Carter et al (1987) proposed bone remodelling was targeted to produce a homeostatic level of an 'effective stimulus ' and Huiskes et al (1987) proposed that the process of bone remodelling was an adaptation that returned the strain energy density in the tissue to a homeostatic value. Bone growth models incorporating both biological and mechanobiological influences have been proposed by van der Meulen et al (1993), for modelling the cross-sectional growth of long bones, and by Stevens et al (1999), for modelling endochondral growth using a finite element model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%