2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2008.11.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trabecular bone strength predictions using finite element analysis of micro-scale images at limited spatial resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
81
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…29 noted that even though strength predicted from linear models correlated well with experimental measurements, errors were appreciably reduced when nonlinear models were used (from 15% to 5%). Similar trends were also noted by Bevill and Keaveny 26 when using element sizes of 80 μm or less, especially for specimens with lower volume fraction.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…29 noted that even though strength predicted from linear models correlated well with experimental measurements, errors were appreciably reduced when nonlinear models were used (from 15% to 5%). Similar trends were also noted by Bevill and Keaveny 26 when using element sizes of 80 μm or less, especially for specimens with lower volume fraction.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…23,24 We therefore posit that nonlinear μFEA might be a more powerful tool to predict fracture risk. 21,[25][26][27][28] A few studies showed the ability of nonlinear μFEA to predict tensile and compressive yield properties of bone. 23,28,29 However, there is little work aimed at predicting trabecular bone post-yield behavior through nonlinear analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the sensitivity of the load estimation algorithm with respect to the image resolution, location, and number of predefined unit loads was not yet thoroughly investigated. The effect of image resolution on the accuracy of micro-FE results, however, has been addressed in several earlier studies, and these studies found that for high-density bone in the femoral head, a resolution of 80 µm is adequate (Bevill and Keaveny 2009;Ulrich et al 1998;Van Rietbergen et al 1995). To further investigate this, we recently performed a pilot study using cubic bone microstructures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FE calculations of apparent modulus were already expressed to be strongly influenced by the threshold used for segmentation of CT data to acquire the FE mesh Hara et al [20], and are highly sensitive to errors due to the strong relationship between volume fraction and mechanical properties. Bevill and Keaveny [21] they sought to settle whether forecasting of yield stress provided by nonlinear FE models could improve correlations with bone strength as compared to the application of anticipations of young modulus from linear FE models, and if this effect depended on a voxel size or bone volume fraction. Literature survey shows that there is no study addressed the effect of slice step size (shortly step size or slice thickness) on natural vibration properties of bone tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%