2006
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2392050574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trabecular Bone Structure of the Calcaneus: Comparison of MR Imaging at 3.0 and 1.5 T with Micro-CT as the Standard of Reference

Abstract: MR imaging at 3.0 T provided a better measure of the trabecular bone structure than did MR imaging at 1.5 T. There was a trend for better differentiation of donors with from those without osteoporotic vertebral fractures at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

5
67
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Trabecular structural parameters measured with 3.0 T are better defined than those at 1.5 T using micro-CT as a reference standard. Although correlations between 3.0 T and microCT are better than 1.5 T, increased trabecular broadening has been observed at 3.0 T due to an increase in susceptibility effect [36] . High correlation has been found also for trabecular number and spacing by comparing 3.0 T MR and high resolution pQCT.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trabecular structural parameters measured with 3.0 T are better defined than those at 1.5 T using micro-CT as a reference standard. Although correlations between 3.0 T and microCT are better than 1.5 T, increased trabecular broadening has been observed at 3.0 T due to an increase in susceptibility effect [36] . High correlation has been found also for trabecular number and spacing by comparing 3.0 T MR and high resolution pQCT.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A magnetic susceptibility difference of about 3 ppm existing between bone and marrow leads to signal dampening at the bonemarrow interface and, as a result, an artificial overestimation of trabecular dimension occurs. This artefact, known as trabecular broadening, is responsible for an apparent increase in trabecular thickness that vary with pulse sequence applied and field strength [36] . MR pulse sequence strongly affects MR susceptibility artefact but it is not clear yet which pulse sequence is the best for trabecular bone imaging [37,38] .…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be problematic in adolescents going through puberty at different times, because the timing of the growth spurt of puberty in these teenagers is variable. This is of particular importance in girls with AN in whom puberty is stalled or delayed and also because prolonged undernutrition can potentially lead to impaired statural growth.Researchers in several studies have used CT and magnetic resonance imaging to assess and analyze trabecular structure in vivo (10,16,20,(38)(39)(40)(41). Use of the distal radius for structure analysis has proved valuable in the prediction of vertebral fractures (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different imaging modalities with various analysis techniques have been successfully applied in both in vitro and clinical in vivo settings to characterize bone geometry and internal structure (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). Trabecular bone architecture is generally described by morphological parameters, such as bone volume/total volume (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), and trabecular number (Tb.N) (11,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%