2006
DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egl005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trace Element and Sr–Pb–Nd–Hf Isotope Evidence for Ancient, Fluid-Dominated Enrichment of the Source of Aldan Shield Lamproites

Abstract: General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
5
58
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…They have relatively low ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr) i and strongly negative e Nd (t) and e Hf (t) values, similar to those of Triassic nepheline syenites in the Liaodong Peninsula (Fig. 7a) and the worldwide lamproites and Group II kimberlites (Nowell et al, 2004;Davies et al, 2006), suggesting that they could be derived from a common source; for example, subcontinental lithospheric mantle (Nowell et al, 2004;Davies et al, 2006). In addition, the geochemistry of the Triassic nepheline syenites also suggests they were derived by partial melting of an enriched, refractory lithospheric mantle source (mica-or amphibole^pyroxene-bearing harzburgite) beneath the NCC .…”
Section: Groupmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They have relatively low ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr) i and strongly negative e Nd (t) and e Hf (t) values, similar to those of Triassic nepheline syenites in the Liaodong Peninsula (Fig. 7a) and the worldwide lamproites and Group II kimberlites (Nowell et al, 2004;Davies et al, 2006), suggesting that they could be derived from a common source; for example, subcontinental lithospheric mantle (Nowell et al, 2004;Davies et al, 2006). In addition, the geochemistry of the Triassic nepheline syenites also suggests they were derived by partial melting of an enriched, refractory lithospheric mantle source (mica-or amphibole^pyroxene-bearing harzburgite) beneath the NCC .…”
Section: Groupmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…7c and d). As summarized by Davies et al (2006), two mantle source components have been proposed to explain the origin of negative Áe Hf signatures: sub-cratonic lithospheric mantle and recycled subducted oceanic crust (Salters & White, 1998;Griffin et al, 2000;Janney et al, 2002;Nowell et al, 2004). However, mineral assemblages, and geochemical and isotopic compositions of mantle xenoliths in Paleozoic kimberlites show that the lithospheric mantle beneath both the North China and Yangtze cratons was relatively ancient, refractory mantle (Menzies et al, 1993;Griffin et al, 1998;Xu et al, 2001;Zhang et al, 2001Zhang et al, , 2004.…”
Section: Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). The magma source regions of each of these potassic rock suites must have had a common history of relatively low time-integrated Rb/Sr but extreme LREE and HFSE enrichment (low time-integrated Sm/Nd and Lu/Hf), and it is generally believed that isotopic evolution of certain frozen metasomatic melts/fluids isolated within cratonic mantle lithosphere can develop such peculiar isotope signatures (Fraser et al, 1985;O'Brien et al, 1995;Davies et al, 2006;Mirnejad and Bell, 2006). There is an increasing body of evidence to support the view that minor mantle phases such as metasomatic Ti-oxides and pyroxenitic clinopyroxene are much more likely to be the principal source of negative eHf signatures than peridotitic clinopyroxene and garnet Choukroun et al, 2005), which are the major hosts of Hf in the SCLM .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the experimental results of Foley (1993), Mitchell (1995) and Mitchell and Edgar (2002), which are permissive of derivation of lamproite magma at lithospheric pressures, we prefer to suggest that the Nuapada lamproites are derived from an SCLM source. The fluids or melts responsible for the development of metasomatic assemblages in the source can be derived from the dehydration or partial melting of subducted slabs (Davies et al 2006;Prelevic et al 2007;Akal 2008) or volatiles or melts that emanate from asthenospheric mantle upwellings (Tainton and McKenzie 1994;Choukroun et al 2005;Mitchell 2006) or both (Mirnejad and Bell 2006). The Nuapada lamproites do not exhibit any large-scale subduction-related signatures such as negative Ti and Nb anomalies, suggesting that subducted materials may not have directly played a major role in the metasomatic input to the lamproite source.…”
Section: Petrogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%