2019
DOI: 10.3133/sir20195113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trace metal and nutrient loads from groundwater seepage into the South Fork Coeur d’Alene River near Smelterville, northern Idaho, 2017

Abstract: For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This report describes results of the 2022 seepage study, specifically focusing on groundwater loading of dissolved zinc, dissolved cadmium, and total phosphorus to the South Fork Coeur d'Alene River. Results of the 2022 seepage study are compared to results of the 2017 USGS seepage study (Zinsser, 2019) to quantify changes in groundwater loading to the South Fork Coeur d'Alene River for dissolved zinc, dissolved cadmium, total phosphorus, and ambient water-quality-criteria (AWQC) ratios, and to describe general water quality pre-and post-remediation via the GWCS within the CIA.…”
Section: Purpose and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This report describes results of the 2022 seepage study, specifically focusing on groundwater loading of dissolved zinc, dissolved cadmium, and total phosphorus to the South Fork Coeur d'Alene River. Results of the 2022 seepage study are compared to results of the 2017 USGS seepage study (Zinsser, 2019) to quantify changes in groundwater loading to the South Fork Coeur d'Alene River for dissolved zinc, dissolved cadmium, total phosphorus, and ambient water-quality-criteria (AWQC) ratios, and to describe general water quality pre-and post-remediation via the GWCS within the CIA.…”
Section: Purpose and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Short site names are used for brevity throughout this report, and data can be found on the National Water Information System web interface (U.S. Geological Survey, 2023) using the site numbers provided in this table. Abbreviations: Ave, Avenue; CTP, Central Treatment Plant; SF, south fork; R, river; ID, Idaho; Crk, creek; abv, above; SFCDR, South Fork Coeur d'Alene River; --, no Numerous seepage studies near the CIA have characterized groundwater loading of metals and phosphorus into the Kellogg-to-Smelterville reach of the South Fork Coeur d'Alene River (Barton, 2002;CH2M Hill, 2009;Zinsser, 2019). In this study area, "seepage study" has been used to describe investigations of groundwater discharge to surface water and surface-water recharge of groundwater that occurs in the South Fork Coeur d'Alene River (Barton, 2002;CH2M Hill, 2009;Zinsser, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, surface water and groundwater readily exchange in multiple areas of the Bunker Hill Superfund Site; for example, areas with bedrock constrictions force groundwater into rivers, and areas with bedrock expansions and a bigger alluvial aquifer promote surface water infiltration into groundwater. Such exchanges occur throughout the SFCDR watershed and have been specifically studied in Canyon Creek, the SFCDR near Osburn, and the SFCDR near Smelterville (Barton, 2002;CH2MHILL, 2009a-b;Zinsser, 2019). Secondary sources of metals therefore include soils, sediment, floodplain deposits, groundwater, and surface water that occur throughout the CDR watershed.…”
Section: Metalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, as described here, the trends for metal concentrations and loads differ substantially from those for total phosphorus and orthophosphate, which indicates that governing processes for each differ. Second, while there is one identified source of phosphorus associated with mining activities (the phosphoric acid wastes in the Central Impoundment Area), loading from this source has been explicitly estimated (CH2M, 2018;Zinsser, 2019) and represents only a small fraction of the phosphorus present in the CDR system. On average, the modeled phosphorus loading from Central Impoundment Area groundwater to the SFCDR was about 6.5 metric tons per year in WYs 2009-14 (CH2M, 2018), whereas the average annual total phosphorus load in CDR at Harrison over the same time period was about 80 metric tons .…”
Section: Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%