2014
DOI: 10.1007/698_2014_318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trace Organic Contaminants Removal by Combined Processes for Wastewater Reuse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional activated sludge and membrane bioreactor processes can efficiently remove bulk organics, nutrients and pathogens. However, certain groups of PPCPs such as significantly hydrophilic compounds and/or compounds with strong electron withdrawing functional groups are poorly removed by the conventional biological treatment processes [2,15,16,17]. Thus, effective treatment processes to remove PPCPs from wastewater is urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional activated sludge and membrane bioreactor processes can efficiently remove bulk organics, nutrients and pathogens. However, certain groups of PPCPs such as significantly hydrophilic compounds and/or compounds with strong electron withdrawing functional groups are poorly removed by the conventional biological treatment processes [2,15,16,17]. Thus, effective treatment processes to remove PPCPs from wastewater is urgently needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2009) obtain 65%, Vieno & Sillanpää (2014) report 23-85, Moya-Llamas et al (2018 obtain 30-75%. In our investigation, the average removal of DCF reached 86%, which might be due to the elevated age of the sludge (SRT) being over 90 days, which allowed the bacterial population to be more diversified and to be able to degrade DCF, either by direct metabolism or by co-metabolic degradation through enzymatic reactions (Vieno & Sillanpää 2014;Hai et al 2015). Consistent with this rationale, Asif et al (2019) report removals for DCF of 50% for SRT of 30 days, and of more than 90% for SRT of 80 days.…”
Section: Phase 1 (Cdmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Combined or hybrid treatment options are also conceptually beneficial, usually leading to improved treatment efficiencies [235][236][237]. Examples of possible combined/hybrid water treatment processes include membrane filtration followed by activated carbon, MBR followed by activated carbon, activated carbon adsorption followed by UV, integrated MBR-TiO 2 photocatalysis, and integrated MBR-PAC adsorption.…”
Section: Combined/hybrid Treatment Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%