2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.25.115329
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TRACE-Seq Reveals Clonal Reconstitution Dynamics of Gene Targeted Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Abstract: Targeted DNA correction of disease-causing mutations in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) may usher in a new class of medicines to treat genetic diseases of the blood and immune system. With state-of-the-art methodologies, it is now possible to correct disease-causing mutations at high frequencies in HSPCs by combining ribonucleoprotein (RNP) delivery of Cas9 and chemically modified sgRNAs with homologous DNA donors via recombinant adeno-associated viral vector serotype six (AAV6). However, becau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1F, G). The heterogeneity in the primary recipients suggests that gene-edited functional HSCs may be at low abundance, similar to the recently observed oligo-clonality of human gene-edited HSCs 20,21 . Consistent with the idea that gene editing caused some toxicity within HSCs, gene editing reduced total donor engraftment levels in competitive transplantation assays (against 1 × 10 6 whole bone marrow cells) by >30% longterm (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1F, G). The heterogeneity in the primary recipients suggests that gene-edited functional HSCs may be at low abundance, similar to the recently observed oligo-clonality of human gene-edited HSCs 20,21 . Consistent with the idea that gene editing caused some toxicity within HSCs, gene editing reduced total donor engraftment levels in competitive transplantation assays (against 1 × 10 6 whole bone marrow cells) by >30% longterm (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In particular, the heterogeneity in engraftment chimerism points toward oligoclonality in gene editing of functional HSCs. Interestingly, this has also been recently observed in human HSPC gene editing via barcoding analysis 20,21 , suggesting this is likely to become an important area for improvement as these approaches move toward the clinic. Unlike current human HSC culture conditions, we can now stably maintain mouse HSCs ex vivo over several weeks 16,17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, we could still confirm engraftment of edited HSCs in secondary recipient mice ( Figure S1F,G ). The heterogeneity in the primary recipients suggests that gene edited functional HSCs may be at low abundance, similar to the recently observed oligo-clonality of human gene-edited HSCs 20 . Consistent with the idea that gene editing caused some toxicity within HSCs, gene editing reduced total donor engraftment levels in competitive transplantation assays (against 1×10 6 whole bone marrow cells) by >30% long-term ( Figure S1H ), even though few differences between mock and RNP+AAV-edited HSCs could be observed in the ex vivo cell cultures ( Figure S1I-K ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In particular, the heterogeneity in engraftment chimerism points towards oligo-clonality in gene editing of functional HSCs. Interestingly, this has also been recently observed in human HSPC gene editing via barcoding analysis 20 , suggesting this is also likely to become an important area for improvement as these approaches move towards the clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…One major caveat of this method is that it has limited sensitivity, depends on the animal model used, and may miss low frequency events (Sato et al, 2019). Alternative in vivo approaches have developed technology to track clonality of cell-based products following ex vivo HSPC editing and transplantation through barcodes included in the HDR template (Ferrari et al, 2021;Sharma et al, 2021) or by tracking indel diversity (Magis et al, 2022). These technologies can identify clones that have expanded abnormally and hint towards genomic events that led to the oncogenic transformation.…”
Section: Linking Genomic Outcomes To Off-target Significancementioning
confidence: 99%