2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2018.06.018
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trace spaces of counterexamples to Naimark's problem

Abstract: A counterexample to Naimark's problem is a C * -algebra that is not isomorphic to the algebra of compact operators on some Hilbert space, yet still has only one irreducible representation up to unitary equivalence. It is well-known that such algebras must be nonseparable, and in 2004 Akemann and Weaver used the diamond principle (a set theoretic axiom independent from ZFC) to give the first counterexamples. For any such counterexample A, the unitary group U(A) acts transitively on the pure states, which are th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A programme analogous to one given by Question 5.1 was pursued in [22] and [21]. In these papers the authors studied the variety of the invariants of counterexamples to Naimark's Problem (using Jensen's diamond).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A programme analogous to one given by Question 5.1 was pursued in [22] and [21]. In these papers the authors studied the variety of the invariants of counterexamples to Naimark's Problem (using Jensen's diamond).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, these obstructions are 'irreversible' in the sense that β cannot be extended to any further hyperfinite extension. This should be contrasted to the 'fleeting' obstructions used in [AW04], [FH17], and [Vac18] where at each step of the construction one had to take care of all objects captured in the earlier stages of the construction.…”
Section: The Obstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the set theoretic machinery we use here is similar to the one used in those papers (albeit somewhat simplified), the operator algebraic techniques turn out to be very different in nature. The results in [AW04,FH17,Vac18] rely on studying the action of outer automorphisms and antiautomorphisms on the pure states of a separable C * -algebra, and use in an essential way results due to Kishimoto ([Kis81]) and work of Kishimoto, Ozawa, and Sakai ( [KOS03]) about the homogeneity of the pure state space of separable C * -algebras. Beyond the fact that pure states of von Neumann algebras are generally not normal, the homogeneity result of Kishimoto-Ozawa-Sakai breaks down for non-separable C * -algebras, and in particular for type II 1 -factors ([KOS03, Remark 2.3]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some elementary observations on the structural properties of these C * -algebras seem to suggest that the trace space (a classical C * -algebraic invariant) of a counterexample is trivial. We prove that this is not the case and we show that, assuming ♦, almost every trace space of a separable C * -algebra also occurs as the trace space of a counterexample (see also [4]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%