2018
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201705054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traceable Nanoparticles with Dual Targeting and ROS Response for RNAi‐Based Immunochemotherapy of Intracranial Glioblastoma Treatment

Abstract: The chemotherapy of glioblastoma is severely hindered by the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, especially the tumor growth factor β (TGF‐β), an immunosuppressive cytokine. In this study, it is proposed to employ RNAi‐based immunomodulation to modify the tumor immune microenvironment and improve the effect of chemotherapy. Herein, a nanotheranostic system (Angiopep LipoPCB(Temozolomide+BAP/siTGF‐β), ALBTA) with dual targeting and ROS response is established for intracranial glioblastoma treatment. The t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
110
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
110
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…RMT is the most commonly adopted strategy, which involves the binding of target ligands conjugated onto the nanoparticle to corresponding receptors expressed on the surface of brain endothelial cells to improve the delivery of loaded therapeutic agents into the brain. [ 2,11–13 ] Recently, several target ligands including transferrin, lactoferrin, and angiopep‐2 have been exploited to cross BBB by receptor‐mediated transcytosis. [ 12,14–16 ] However, the less than 1.0% of the brain accumulation rate of these nanoparticles cannot meet the requirements of clinical use, which is due to the low efficiency of ligand upload on nanoparticles, weak binding ability with receptors, and the competition of high concentration of endogenous ligands in the blood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RMT is the most commonly adopted strategy, which involves the binding of target ligands conjugated onto the nanoparticle to corresponding receptors expressed on the surface of brain endothelial cells to improve the delivery of loaded therapeutic agents into the brain. [ 2,11–13 ] Recently, several target ligands including transferrin, lactoferrin, and angiopep‐2 have been exploited to cross BBB by receptor‐mediated transcytosis. [ 12,14–16 ] However, the less than 1.0% of the brain accumulation rate of these nanoparticles cannot meet the requirements of clinical use, which is due to the low efficiency of ligand upload on nanoparticles, weak binding ability with receptors, and the competition of high concentration of endogenous ligands in the blood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy has attracted much attention, yet the efficacy of drugs and the pharmacokinetics remain to be confirmed. With the development of nanotechnology and nanomedicine in the recent decades, various drug delivery vehicles, such as liposomes [21][22][23], hydrogels [24], micelles [25,26], polymers [27][28][29] and inorganic nanoparticles [30][31][32][33][34][35] have been developed to incorporate therapeutics and to deliver them into tumor sites and CNS.…”
Section: Ivyspringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of dually targeted gene and drug delivery vehicle. Adapted with permission . Copyright 2018, Wiley.…”
Section: Hybrid Vesicular Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aforementioned system, the positively charged nanoparticles were electrostatically conjugated to siRNA against TGFβ. Afterward, the surfaces of the nanoparticles were coated with maleimide‐functionalized lipid envelopes made of a zwitterionic lipid called distearoyl phosphoethanol‐aminepolycarboxybetaine (DSPE‐PCB), and the final nanoparticle was functionalized with a targeting ligand against angiopep‐2 that could target glioblastoma cells …”
Section: Hybrid Vesicular Delivery Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%