2020
DOI: 10.5194/jsss-9-391-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traceably calibrated scanning Hall probe microscopy at room temperature

Abstract: Abstract. Fabrication, characterization and comparison of gold and graphene micro- and nanoscale Hall sensors for room temperature scanning magnetic field microscopy applications are presented. The Hall sensors with active areas from 5 µm down to 50 nm were fabricated by electron-beam lithography. The calibration of the Hall sensors in an external magnetic field revealed a sensitivity of 3.2 mV A−1 T−1 ± 0.3 % for gold and 1615 V A−1  T−1 ± 0.5 % for graphene at room temperature. The gold sensors were fabricat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To perform ESR spectroscopy for such a tiny sample, a microscale magnetometer can be an alternative detector of the ESR signal. For instance, scanning Hall probe microscope [6][7][8][9] , magnetic force microscope [10][11][12] , nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond [13][14][15] , and superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUID) [16][17][18][19] have been employed for this purpose. Unfortunately these magnetometers exhibits a trade-off between spatial resolution and sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform ESR spectroscopy for such a tiny sample, a microscale magnetometer can be an alternative detector of the ESR signal. For instance, scanning Hall probe microscope [6][7][8][9] , magnetic force microscope [10][11][12] , nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond [13][14][15] , and superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUID) [16][17][18][19] have been employed for this purpose. Unfortunately these magnetometers exhibits a trade-off between spatial resolution and sensitivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%