2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2014.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracer diffusion coefficients of lithium ion in LiMn2O4 measured by neutron radiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A further validation of our MD simulation tool is presented in Figure 3. As seen in this figure, for the fully lithiated LMO spinel, there is a good agreement between the diffusion coefficient values calculated from MD simulations and the experimental data of Takai et al [34] . and Kuwata et al.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A further validation of our MD simulation tool is presented in Figure 3. As seen in this figure, for the fully lithiated LMO spinel, there is a good agreement between the diffusion coefficient values calculated from MD simulations and the experimental data of Takai et al [34] . and Kuwata et al.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The findings emanating from this computational work will be useful to the battery research community since performing experiments at the molecular scale are not only very expensive but also continue to pose a great challenge in obtaining precise results, especially for the variety of relevant doping scenarios that we investigate in this work. In fact, the challenge in performing precise experiments is also evident from the wide range of diffusion coefficients values at room temperature (10 −8 –10 −15 cm 2 s −1 ) reported in the literature, all of which are obtained from a variety measuring techniques [32–34] . This is not surprising because in addition to the limitation of the equipment used in these experiments, the transport and other properties strongly depend on the preparatory procedures that can influence the micro structure, defects, and atomic structure of the crystal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 16,17 ] The calculated Zn‐ion migration barrier is the highest at the transition state—in between the T d and the O h sites—at 0.59 eV, which is notable that it is only slightly higher than the Li‐ion migration barrier of 0.52 eV in spinel LiMn 2 O 4 material that has demonstrated Li‐ion insertion at practical rates. [ 36 ] Hence, it can be concluded that Zn‐ion diffusion in 2H‐NbSe 2 is in fact facile as observed and the relatively low migration barrier for a divalent cation like Zn ion is feasible due to the reduced host‐guest interaction provided by the weakly interacting and widely separated layers of the 2H‐NbSe 2 structure as well as the polarizable Se anions that form the lattice. Also, the metallic nature of 2H‐NbSe 2 would aid in electronic charge distribution during Zn‐ion diffusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For nanoarray-based electrodes, it is expected that the open pore geometry enables very direct and unhindered Li + -ion diffusion pathways within the electrode. Furthermore, the Li + -ion diffusion coefficient is several orders of magnitude higher in the electrolyte (~10 −6 cm 2 s −1 for LP30) [47,48] than in LTO (~10 −12 -10 −14 cm 2 s −1 ) [49][50][51] or LMO (~10 −12 -10 −14 cm 2 s −1 ) [52,53]. However, Li + -ion diffusion lengths are several orders of magnitude longer in the electrolyte (up to 175 µm) than in the particles (10-50 nm), which eventually leads to similar time scales for both diffusion processes.…”
Section: Structure Property Relationship In Lto-vacnt Nanoarraysmentioning
confidence: 96%