2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12486-0_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracer Investigations of the Nature and Structure of Subsurface Voids in Mildly Karstic Aquifers: an Example from the English Chalk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, in mildly karstified areas, even if the flow velocity reached several kilometers per day, the tracer recovery was only 25-35% [15]. Maurice considered that the significant attenuation was probably due to the dispersion of tracers from the main conduit flow paths into small voids [15]. In our test, although the study area is a well-developed karst system, the flow velocity is relatively lower compared to that of other karst areas discussed above.…”
Section: Tracer Velocity and Recoverymentioning
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, in mildly karstified areas, even if the flow velocity reached several kilometers per day, the tracer recovery was only 25-35% [15]. Maurice considered that the significant attenuation was probably due to the dispersion of tracers from the main conduit flow paths into small voids [15]. In our test, although the study area is a well-developed karst system, the flow velocity is relatively lower compared to that of other karst areas discussed above.…”
Section: Tracer Velocity and Recoverymentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Relatively rapid flow and low tracer recovery indicate the high storage percentage in the karst. Some researchers conjectured that there was limited connected conduit network in the paths where the tracers passed [1,15,22].…”
Section: Conduit Characteristics Of Receiving Springsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations