Parametric images for dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) are
typically generated by an indirect method, i.e., reconstructing a time series of
emission images, then fitting a kinetic model to each voxel time activity curve.
Alternatively, “direct reconstruction,” incorporates the kinetic
model into the reconstruction algorithm itself, directly producing parametric
images from projection data. Direct reconstruction has been shown to achieve
parametric images with lower standard error than the indirect method. Here, we
present direct reconstruction for brain PET using event-by-event motion
correction of list-mode data, applied to two tracers.
Event-by-event motion correction was implemented for direct
reconstruction in the Parametric Motion-compensation OSEM List-mode Algorithm
for Resolution-recovery reconstruction. The direct implementation was tested on
simulated and human datasets with tracers [11C]AFM
(serotonin transporter) and [11C]UCB-J (synaptic
density), which follow the 1-tissue compartment model. Rigid head motion was
tracked with the Vicra system. Parametric images of
K1 and distribution volume
(VT=K1/k2)
were compared to those generated by the indirect method by regional coefficient
of variation (CoV). Performance across count levels was assessed using
sub-sampled datasets.
For simulated and real datasets at high counts, the two methods estimated
K1 and VT with
comparable accuracy. At lower count levels, the direct method was substantially
more robust to outliers than the indirect method. Compared to the indirect
method, direct reconstruction reduced regional K1
CoV by 35–48% (simulated dataset), 39–43%
([11C]AFM dataset) and 30–36%
([11C]UCB-J dataset) across count levels
(averaged over regions at matched iteration); VT CoV
was reduced by 51–58%, 54–60% and
30–46%, respectively. Motion correction played an important role
in the dataset with larger motion: correction increased regional
VT by 51% on average in the
[11C]UCB-J dataset.
Direct reconstruction of dynamic brain PET with event-by-event motion
correction is achievable and dramatically more robust to noise in
VT images than the indirect method.