“…But most importantly, the state variables that encapsulate the evolutionary effects originate from measurable physical quantities, may it be the real area of contact (Aharonov & Scholz, 2018, 2019; Bar‐Sinai et al., 2014; Barbot, 2019b, 2022; Boitnott et al., 1992; Bowden & Tabor, 1964; Sleep, 2006) or the porosity (J. Chen, 2023; J. Chen & Spiers, 2016; J. Chen et al., 2017; Sleep, 2005). The evolving texture of the fault gouge influences other observables, including fluid permeability (Im et al., 2019; Proctor et al., 2020), electrical conductivity (Yamashita et al., 2014), acoustic transmissivity (Fukuyama et al., 2019; Kocharyan et al., 2018; Nagata et al., 2008, 2012; Rouet‐Leduc et al., 2018), optical transparency and reflectivity (Bayart et al., 2018; Ben‐David et al., 2010; Dieterich & Kilgore, 1994; Rubinstein et al., 2004; Selvadurai & Glaser, 2015, 2017), fault compaction and dilatancy (Carpenter, Ikari, & Marone, 2016; Marone et al., 1990), and the density of off‐fault damage (Goebel et al., 2014). Hence, these physical quantities can serve as proxies for state variables in nature or in the laboratory, potentially explaining subtle changes in crustal properties shortly before and after earthquakes (Brenguier et al., 2008; Kato & Ben‐Zion, 2021; Y. Li et al., 1998).…”