2003
DOI: 10.1097/00003643-200301000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When we separated the study protocols to enable a comparison of remifentanil use with the administration of alfentanil, fentanyl, or sufentanil, we found that remifentanil was associated with an increased incidence of postoperative shivering compared with alfentanil (RR = 2.73; 95% CI, 1.72-4.34; P b .0001; I 2 = 0.00%; Cochran's Q = 5.27) [1,2,11,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]31,32] or fentanyl (RR = 2.04; 95% CI, 1.60-2.60; P b .00001; I 2 = 0.00%; Cochran's Q = 1.13) [3,10,12,19,30,33,34], but no significant difference was seen when compared with sufentanil (RR = 2.13; 95% CI, 0.67-6.74; P = .20; I 2 = 0.00%; Cochran's Q = 1.07) [17,18,29] as shown in Figure 2. The study protocol included the use of propofol or inhalation anesthesia for the maintenance of anesthesia.…”
Section: Results Of the Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When we separated the study protocols to enable a comparison of remifentanil use with the administration of alfentanil, fentanyl, or sufentanil, we found that remifentanil was associated with an increased incidence of postoperative shivering compared with alfentanil (RR = 2.73; 95% CI, 1.72-4.34; P b .0001; I 2 = 0.00%; Cochran's Q = 5.27) [1,2,11,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]31,32] or fentanyl (RR = 2.04; 95% CI, 1.60-2.60; P b .00001; I 2 = 0.00%; Cochran's Q = 1.13) [3,10,12,19,30,33,34], but no significant difference was seen when compared with sufentanil (RR = 2.13; 95% CI, 0.67-6.74; P = .20; I 2 = 0.00%; Cochran's Q = 1.07) [17,18,29] as shown in Figure 2. The study protocol included the use of propofol or inhalation anesthesia for the maintenance of anesthesia.…”
Section: Results Of the Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the incidence of postoperative shivering related to sufentanil administration could not be determined because of the limited number of articles. The meta-analysis by Komatsu et al included results contained in conference abstracts [14,15], and we were unable to acquire the results of 1 postoperative shivering trial [16]. In addition, papers that have been published since the meta-analysis by Komatsu et al showed no significant difference in the incidence of shivering when remifentanil was compared with fentanyl or sufentanil [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stevens and Wheatley et al [6] reported that remifentanil at doses of 3.0 and 4.0 μg/kg in combination with propofol decreased postintubation HR and MAP compared with preinduction values. The decrease in MAP and HR was well tolerated in healthy patients and did not require additional treatment [13,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In healthy outpatients, bolus administration of remifentanil provided effective control of the acute hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with [7] and without muscle relaxants [5,6]. In children, Min et al [15] showed that the optimal bolus dose of remifentanil for successful tracheal intubation was 0.56 μg/kg in 50% of children during inhalation induction using 5% sevoflurane in oxygen without neuromuscular blocking agents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who are not first given a muscle relaxant undergo more intubation attempts, require greater intubation time, and experience a higher incidence of events during intubation than those who receive a muscle relaxant [4]. Tracheal intubation may be accomplished without muscle relaxants, but satisfactory conditions are not reliably obtained in all patients [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%