1985
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-198510000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracheal Mucus Clearance in High Frequency Oscillation. II. Chest Wall Versus Mouth Oscillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with those of King et al 21 Again, expiratory flow bias (expiratory Ͼ inspiratory flow) was compared with inspiratory flow bias in anesthetized dogs receiving mechanical ventilation with high frequency oscillations at 13 Hz. They found that mucus clearance was 2.4 times higher with expiratory bias than with inspiratory bias.…”
Section: Expiratory-inspiratory Flow Ratiosupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These findings are consistent with those of King et al 21 Again, expiratory flow bias (expiratory Ͼ inspiratory flow) was compared with inspiratory flow bias in anesthetized dogs receiving mechanical ventilation with high frequency oscillations at 13 Hz. They found that mucus clearance was 2.4 times higher with expiratory bias than with inspiratory bias.…”
Section: Expiratory-inspiratory Flow Ratiosupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It may be the combination of techniques that promote secretion clearance. Incorporating a slow inspiratory¯ow with IPPB may be important and chest wall vibrations during expiration may increase peak expiratory¯ow as well as intrathoracic airway narrowing [19]. The greater difference between inspiratory and expiratory air¯ow produced may favour two phase¯ow (gas liquid interaction) and enhanced tracheal mucus transport [20].…”
Section: Airway Clearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also tested HFO at 14 Hz, the justification for which was that Freitag et al 7 found that it was the most efficient frequency for HFO, and King et al observed that 13 Hz (very close to 14 Hz) delivered to the airway lumen had no significant benefit, but instead appeared to inhibit mucus transport. 25 By using a reciprocal air flow to simulate tidal breathing and conditioning the air flowing in both directions, the intact tube preparation essentially embodied the situation that probably occurs over most of the length of the trachea in vivo. This makes the tube preparation a more robust model than monodirectional air flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%