1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf01954523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracheostomy in children

Abstract: We reviewed the records of 108 patients who had a tracheostomy performed over a 10-year period from July 1979 to April 1989. Median age at tracheostomy was 6 months (1 week-15 years). Indications for surgery were acquired subglottic stenosis (31.4%), bilateral vocal cord paralysis (22.2%), congenital airway malformations (22.2%) and tumours (11.1%). No epiglottis and no emergency situation had to be managed by tracheostomy. Operation was uneventful in all, but 8 patients (7.4%) developed a pneumothorax in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
23
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Past controversies about tracheostomies in burn patients have been resolved by current reports that indicate due to lower airway ventilation volumes and lower tracheostomy cuff pressures, tracheostomies are generally safe and effective [2,6,9,10]. However, although tracheostomies provide safe airways for pediatric burn patients, decisions on removal of tracheostomies may be influenced by age related factors and established guidelines for tracheostomy care to reduce time to decannulation have not been well studied especially in children [11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Past controversies about tracheostomies in burn patients have been resolved by current reports that indicate due to lower airway ventilation volumes and lower tracheostomy cuff pressures, tracheostomies are generally safe and effective [2,6,9,10]. However, although tracheostomies provide safe airways for pediatric burn patients, decisions on removal of tracheostomies may be influenced by age related factors and established guidelines for tracheostomy care to reduce time to decannulation have not been well studied especially in children [11,12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For most children who require a tracheostomy, the procedure is temporary and the tracheostomy can eventually be removed once the underlying condition has resolved spontaneously or has been corrected [1][2][3][4]. The decision to decannulate must not be taken lightly, however, as death has been reported even during supervised decannulation in hospital [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The presence of a blocked tube in the airway provides an additional test of the child's reserve--if they can manage despite this, they are more likely to have sufficient reserve not to develop problems during exercise or an upper respiratory tract infection. Some authors advocate just capping the current tube [4], while others prefer to change the tube for a small one, either immediately [6] or through progressively smaller sizes [1]. Fenestration of the tracheotomy tube prior to its capping has its advocates [7], although this carries risks including tube fracture, granulations entering the tube and misdirection of suction catheters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some authors have reported that the incidence of complications encountered during open tracheostomy in children is as high as 20% [8]. These complications include dystrophic calcification in the region of the tracheostome, causing tracheostenosis, some to an extent of near total occlusion, or substantial granulation tissue above the tracheostomy that necessitated recannulation of the tracheostomy tube.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%