2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2012.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracing ideologies of learning in group talk and their impediments to collaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They used the interpretive paths and processes that were endorsed by their teacher and peers to construct meanings. The process of socialization into how students should talk about books is not necessarily a good or bad thing by itself (Anderson & Weninger, 2012). However, when students learn to talk in specific ways about books they are also learning not to talk in other, possibly important ways of discussing literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the interpretive paths and processes that were endorsed by their teacher and peers to construct meanings. The process of socialization into how students should talk about books is not necessarily a good or bad thing by itself (Anderson & Weninger, 2012). However, when students learn to talk in specific ways about books they are also learning not to talk in other, possibly important ways of discussing literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students are raised within a system that historically has placed a premium on performance on standardized testing (Cheah 1998). In their discourse-analytic study of everyday talk, Anderson and Weninger (2012) show how Singaporean students are preoccupied with individual accomplishment, viewing learning as an individual cognitive achievement with an end product, even in learning contexts where performance is not being measured by teachers. Students’ achievements are implicitly understood as being for the State rather than for themselves.…”
Section: Setting the Scenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Φαίλεηαη επνκέλσο φηη ζην εμήο ε δηάζηαζε ηνπ γξακκαηηζκνχ είλαη ζεκαληηθφ λα ελζσκαησζεί απφ ηε ζεσξία θαη ηελ έξεπλα ζηηο ζρεηηθέο κε ηελ νκαδνζπλεξγαζία πξαθηηθέο, πξνθεηκέλνπ θαη ν ξφινο ησλ εθπαηδεπηηθψλ θαη ε θηλεηηθφηεηά ηνπο ζε ηαπηφηεηεο λα απνθηήζνπλ επηπιένλ δπλακηθή. (Anderson & Weninger, 2012).…”
Section: ο ρόλοσ των εκπαιδευτικών κατϊ την υποςτόριξη των ομϊδωνunclassified
“…Αμηνπνηψληαο δεδνκέλα απφ δχν ηάμεηο Πξσηνβάζκηαο Δθπαίδεπζεο ζηε ηγθαπνχξε (κία κε καζεηέο πςειψλ θαη κία κε καζεηέο ρακειψλ επηδφζεσλ), δηεξεπλνχλ ην πνχ έδηλαλ βαξχηεηα νη δχν εθπαηδεπηηθνί ησλ δχν ηάμεσλ, φηαλ εηζήγαγαλ ηνπο καζεηέο ηνπο ζηελ νκαδηθή εξγαζία, θαη πψο δηακφξθσζαλ ηηο ζπλζήθεο εηζαγσγήο ζηελ νκαδηθή εξγαζία. Α-ληιψληαο απφ ην ε θάζε πεξίπησζε, ν ξφινο ηνπ ζρνιηθνχ ιφγνπ πνπ εθθέξεηαη θαηά ηε δαζθαινκαζεηηθή αιιειεπίδξαζε ζηελ νκαδνζπλεξγαηηθή δηδαζθαιία ππνζηεξίδεηαη φηη έρεη ηεξάζηηα ζεκαζία(Anderson & Weninger, 2012). H Gillies (2004) ιφγνπ ράξε επηζεκαίλεη ηηο ζηαηηζηηθά ζεκαληηθέο δηαθνξέο πνπ παξαηήξεζε ζηε ιεθηηθή ζπκπεξηθνξά θαη αιιειεπίδξαζε ησλ καζεηψλ, αλάκεζα ζε ηάμεηο ησλ νπνίσλ νη εθπαηδεπηηθνί είραλ πξνεγνπκέλσο επηκνξθσζεί ζε ζπγθεθξηκέλεο ηερληθέο αλάπηπμεο επηθνηλσληαθψλ δεμηνηήησλ θαη ζε ηάμεηο ησλ νπνίσλ νη εθπαηδεπηηθνί δε δηέζεηαλ αληίζηνηρε επηκφξθσζε.…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation