“…3A), which are often larger than the lifetime of a liquid for a given magmatic system (e.g., Cashman et al, 2017). There are potential geological mechanisms for such large ranges in zircon dates in a single sample, such as recycling of antecrystic (i.e., zircon crystallized from earlier phases of the same magmatic system) or xenocrystic (i.e., zircon inherited at depth and/or assimilated from wall rock; e.g., Miller et al, 2007) zircon grains into younger felsic magmas, and/or mixing of age domains between older zircon material with the younger overgrowths (e.g., Gaynor et al, 2022bGaynor et al, , 2023. Furthermore, there are also analytical artifacts inherent with in-situ techniques that can also cause dispersed U-Pb dates within individual samples, including unmitigated Pb-loss or unresolved discordance due to greater analytical uncertainties (e.g., Chelle-Michou et al, 2014;Gaynor et al, 2022b).…”