2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracing source, distribution and health risk of potentially harmful elements (PHEs) in street dust of Durgapur, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicated that ingestion was the main pathway of PTEs into the local population in, followed by dermal contact and inhalation. This result is consistent with previously reported results for road dust and contaminated soil in other cities [84,85,[128][129][130]. : not acceptable risk.…”
Section: Non-carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Risksupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The results indicated that ingestion was the main pathway of PTEs into the local population in, followed by dermal contact and inhalation. This result is consistent with previously reported results for road dust and contaminated soil in other cities [84,85,[128][129][130]. : not acceptable risk.…”
Section: Non-carcinogenic and Carcinogenic Risksupporting
confidence: 93%
“…gde je TRF faktor toksičnog dejstva za određenu supstancu (Cd = 30, Pb = Cu = Ni = 5; Cr = 2; Zn = Mn = 1) [29], C i predstavlja sadržaj elementa u uzorku, a C 0 je sadržaj odgovarajućeg elementa u poljoprivrednom zemljištu (vrednosti su uzete iz Izveštaja o stanju zemljišta u Republici Srbiji) [30].…”
Section: Er = Trf(c I /C 0 )unclassified
“…The application of different geochemical indicators normalized to the background values is a more reliable approach to compare the environmental quality. (Chen et al 2019;Gope et al 2018). In general, depending on the method of calculation, the following indicators provide useful information about the level of contamination: (1) geoaccumulation index (I geo ) (Chen et al 2015b;Dung et al 2013;Guan et al 2014;Ghazaryan et al 2015;Inengite et al 2015;Karim et al 2015;Liu et al 2016;Müller 1969;Ololade 2014;Omotoso and Ojo 2015;Sayadi et al 2015;Tang et al 2015;Wang et al 2015) and contamination factor (CF) (Håkanson 1980;Inengite et al 2015;Loska et al 2004) as the level of pollution caused by the individual heavy metal, (2) pollution load index (PLI) as the scale of total heavy metal pollution (Tomlinson et al 1980), (3) enrichment factor (EF) to detect the source of heavy metal contamination (natural or anthropogenic) (Inengite et al 2015;Karim et al 2015;Mohamed et al 2014), and (4) potential ecological risk index (PERI) as the source of harmful effects on the environment (Pejman et al 2015;Sayadi et al 2015;Tang et al 2015;Wang et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%