2019
DOI: 10.1109/tcns.2018.2850225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking and Control of Gauss–Markov Processes over Packet-Drop Channels with Acknowledgments

Abstract: We consider the problem of tracking the state of Gauss-Markov processes over rate-limited erasureprone links. We concentrate first on the scenario in which several independent processes are seen by a single observer. The observer maps the processes into finite-rate packets that are sent over the erasureprone links to a state estimator, and are acknowledged upon packet arrivals. The aim of the state estimator is to track the processes with zero delay and with minimum mean square error (MMSE). We show that, in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result in (R2) provides a smaller system realization with significantly reduced complexity compared to [1], [14], [15] where two KF algorithms are required. Moreover, identifying the realization coefficients is important because they can lead to practical achievability schemes to bound the optimal performance theoretically attainable by causal codes [22] or the minimum average length of all causal prefix-free codes, see, e.g., [1], [4], [5], [23]. If the assumption of commuting matrices does not hold in (R3), then, our reverse-waterfilling solution offers an elegant sub-optimal (upper bound) solution.…”
Section: A Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result in (R2) provides a smaller system realization with significantly reduced complexity compared to [1], [14], [15] where two KF algorithms are required. Moreover, identifying the realization coefficients is important because they can lead to practical achievability schemes to bound the optimal performance theoretically attainable by causal codes [22] or the minimum average length of all causal prefix-free codes, see, e.g., [1], [4], [5], [23]. If the assumption of commuting matrices does not hold in (R3), then, our reverse-waterfilling solution offers an elegant sub-optimal (upper bound) solution.…”
Section: A Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, it should be pointed out that the optimal codingestimation policy cannot be written in the separated form as presented for the single observation case, for details, see e.g., [17]. On the other hand, the derived results in this work make it interesting to consider the extension of this framework to closed-loop networked control systems where the objective is to identify the performance of control under communication constraints, see for instance [5], [8], [36]. Due to the nonlinear and uncertain characteristics of most of the practical networked systems, see e.g., [6], [7], [37], the design and performance analysis of the coding-estimation and control systems in such cases will be also under consideration in future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 39 ] provides an asymptotically optimal scheme that roughly uses Gaussian codebooks to quantize the innovation errors between the encoder’s observation and the decoder’s estimation. Our work is closest to [ 39 ] and our encoding scheme shares similarities with the predictive Differential Pulse Code Modulation (DPCM) based scheme employed in [ 39 ]. However, our work differs in an important aspect from all the works mentioned in this research thread: we take transmission delays into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, our converse bound is derived using similar methods as [ 39 ]. Even the achievability part of our proof draws from [ 39 ], but there is a technical caveat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation