2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19030741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking and Estimation of Multiple Cross-Over Targets in Clutter

Abstract: Tracking problems, including unknown number of targets, target trajectories behaviour and uncertain motion of targets in the surveillance region, are challenging issues. It is also difficult to estimate cross-over targets in heavy clutter density environment. In addition, tracking algorithms including smoothers which use measurements from upcoming scans to estimate the targets are often unsuccessful in tracking due to low detection probabilities. For efficient and better tracking performance, the smoother must… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation analysis compares the estimation accuracy, root-mean square errors (RMSEs), FTD track quality measure, and track retention of the RTS-LMIPDA, FIsJIPDA [16], FIsJITS [17], sJIPDA [18], sJITS [19], and LMIPDA [10] algorithms. The RTS-LMIPDA algorithm is designed to track six targets that are crossing near the position (387, 300) m and are closely moving in a twodimensional surveillance region that is 700 m wide along the x-and y-axes, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Analysis Using Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation analysis compares the estimation accuracy, root-mean square errors (RMSEs), FTD track quality measure, and track retention of the RTS-LMIPDA, FIsJIPDA [16], FIsJITS [17], sJIPDA [18], sJITS [19], and LMIPDA [10] algorithms. The RTS-LMIPDA algorithm is designed to track six targets that are crossing near the position (387, 300) m and are closely moving in a twodimensional surveillance region that is 700 m wide along the x-and y-axes, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Analysis Using Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms were extended for smoothing MTT by utilizing a joint data association algorithm, such as fixed interval smoothing based on JIPDA (FIsJIPDA) [16]. Recently, fixed interval smoothing was utilized in multi-scan, multi-target joint integrated track splitting to calculate the smoothing a-posteriori probabilities of the multiple track components associated in a cluster for smoothing state estimation [17]. RTS smoothing equations in a JIPDA algorithm (sJIPDA) use the forward track validated measurements to obtain a backward track prediction [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that each forward track is conditioned on a set of backward multi-components. Each forward state component forms a certain number of true pairs in association with backward multi-tracks components using the validation measurement selection criterion expressed in (20). This procedure is illustrated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Xτcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example of smoothing based on JITS (sJITS), the authors have applied the two-way pass filtering method of the Fraser and Potter algorithm [18] in [19]. In [20], the fixed interval smoothing based on JITS (FIsJITS) was developed for MTT, which outperformed the algorithms developed in [14,17,19]. However, due to involvement of clusters as well as ITS multi-track components, the joint data association procedure in FIsJITS and sJITS is computationally intensive and complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], FLIPDA‐S employed JIPDA to propose fixed‐interval smoothing JIPDA (JIPDAS) in MTT environments. Later, FLIPDA‐S is extended to a multi‐scan algorithm known as fixed‐interval integrated track splitting smoothing for tracking a single target in [19, 20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%