1994
DOI: 10.1016/0898-5898(94)90012-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking and linguistic minority students: Consequences of ability grouping for second language learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with the exception of Gina, the teachers did not attempt to alter their traditional methods of assessment. In other studies of secondary ELLs, researchers have found that educators confused ELLs' English language ability with academic or cognitive ability (Fu, 1995;Harklau, 1994Harklau, , 1999Verplaetse, 1998). That was not the case in this study.…”
Section: The Inequity Of Equal Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the exception of Gina, the teachers did not attempt to alter their traditional methods of assessment. In other studies of secondary ELLs, researchers have found that educators confused ELLs' English language ability with academic or cognitive ability (Fu, 1995;Harklau, 1994Harklau, , 1999Verplaetse, 1998). That was not the case in this study.…”
Section: The Inequity Of Equal Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…District leaders' perspectives on ability grouping were evenly split: almost the same percentage of district leaders reported strongly agreeing/agreeing (51.9%) that more students would successfully complete algebra earlier if they were grouped by ability as those reporting to disagree/strongly disagree (48.1%). Given the overwhelming evidence in research, dating back to the 1980s, about the effects of tracking on students (e.g., Chunn, 1988;Gamoran, 1992;Harklau, 1994;Lucas, 2001;Welner & Oakes, 1996), it is surprising that so many district leaders agreed with this statement. Response patterns for these questions are shown in Figure 5.3.…”
Section: F I G U R E 5 2 D I S T R I C T L E a D E R P E R S P E mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Teachers of ELL students have higher mobility rates (Katz, 1999), schools that serve large numbers of ELL students have poorer infrastructures (Gándara et al, 2003), and ELL students are disproportionately represented in nonacademic or lowtrack classes (Gándara et al, 2003;Harklau, 1994). Much less is understood, however, Figure 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%