2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-021-06458-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking control for underactuated non-minimum phase multibody systems

Abstract: We consider tracking control for multibody systems which are modeled using holonomic and non-holonomic constraints. Furthermore, the systems may be underactuated and contain kinematic loops and are thus described by a set of differential-algebraic equations that cannot be reformulated as ordinary differential equations in general. We propose a control strategy which combines a feedforward controller based on the servo-constraints approach with a feedback controller based on a recent funnel control design. As a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, output tracking with unknown output derivatives is possible for the class of linear minimum phase systems (4); and moreover, for a class of linear non-minimum phase systems (single-input, single output systems as well as multi-input, multioutput systems). Since the investigations in the recent works [9] and [6] show applicability of existing control techniques to nonlinear non-minimum phase systems we are confident that an integration of the funnel pre-compensator into this particular context will also be fruitful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, output tracking with unknown output derivatives is possible for the class of linear minimum phase systems (4); and moreover, for a class of linear non-minimum phase systems (single-input, single output systems as well as multi-input, multioutput systems). Since the investigations in the recent works [9] and [6] show applicability of existing control techniques to nonlinear non-minimum phase systems we are confident that an integration of the funnel pre-compensator into this particular context will also be fruitful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Remark 3. 6 The somewhat arcane condition T ∈ T rm,q σ,1 reflects the intuition that in order to have the conjunction of the system with the funnel pre-compensator being a minimum phase system, we must be able to conclude from the available information (only the output y) that the internal dynamics stay bounded. Note that this, however, does not mean that the operator T does not act on the output signal's derivatives but on y only, see Example 5.2.…”
Section: The Funnel Pre-compensator Applied To Minimum Phase Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As soon as the saturation becomes inactive again, the performance funnel recovers its desired shape exponentially fast. The concept of funnel control was developed in the seminal work [20] (see also the recent survey in [6]) and proved advantageous in a variety of applications such as control of industrial servo-systems [15] and underactuated multibody systems [5,8], control of electrical circuits [11,29], control of peak inspiratory pressure [26], adaptive cruise control [10] and even the control of infinitedimensional systems such as a boundary controlled heat equation [27], a moving water tank [9] and defibrillation processes of the human heart [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of funnel control goes back to the seminal work [14], see also the survey in [15]. The funnel controller proved to be the appropriate tool for tracking problems in various applications such as control of industrial servosystems [16] and underactuated multibody systems [17], [18],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%