2023
DOI: 10.3390/w15183300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking Multiphase Flows through Steep Reservoirs with External Constraint

Mubbashar Nazeer,
Waqas Ali,
Farooq Hussain

Abstract: Problem statement: The study offers theoretical formulations for high-viscosity particulate flows in inclined reservoirs, taking into account the presence of homogeneous spheroidal particles of various types to produce discrete two-phase suspensions. Purpose: The primary objective of this analytical and comparative study is to identify the most dependable nanoparticles among hafnium and crystal metals that are suspended in an Eyring–Powell fluid through an inclined channel while being subjected to external mag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differential equation obtained in Equation ( 24) is highly non-linear, so its solution cannot be calculated easily, therefore the semi-analytical (i.e., perturbation technique) [40][41][42][43] is used for small 𝑊𝑒 << 1. We define the following expressions:…”
Section: Perturbation Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differential equation obtained in Equation ( 24) is highly non-linear, so its solution cannot be calculated easily, therefore the semi-analytical (i.e., perturbation technique) [40][41][42][43] is used for small 𝑊𝑒 << 1. We define the following expressions:…”
Section: Perturbation Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential equation obtained in Equation () is highly non‐linear, so its solution cannot be calculated easily, therefore the semi‐analytical (i.e., perturbation technique) [40–43] is used for small We<<1.$We &lt; &lt; 1.$ We define the following expressions: ubadbreak=u0goodbreak+Weu1goodbreak+We2u2goodbreak+O(We3),$$\begin{equation}u = {u}_0 + We{u}_1 + W{e}^2{u}_2 + O(W{e}^3),\end{equation}$$ dpdxbadbreak=dp0dxgoodbreak+Wedp1dxgoodbreak+We2dp2dxgoodbreak+O()We3,$$\begin{equation}\frac{{dp}}{{dx}} = \frac{{d{p}_0}}{{dx}} + We\frac{{d{p}_1}}{{dx}} + W{e}^2\frac{{d{p}_2}}{{dx}} + O\left( {W{e}^3} \right),\end{equation}$$ λbadbreak=λ0goodbreak+Weλ1goodbreak+We2λ2goodbreak+O()We3,$$\begin{equation}\lambda = {\lambda }_0 + We{\lambda }_1 + W{e}^2{\lambda }_2 + O\left( {W{e}^3} \right),\end{equation}$$ xsbadbreak=x0goodbreak+Wex1goodbreak+We2x2goodbreak+O()We3,$$\begin{equation}{x}_s = {x}_0 + We{x}_1 + W{e}^2{x}_2 + O\left( {W{e}^3} \right),\end{equation}$$ …”
Section: Perturbation Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%