2018 16th International Workshop on Acoustic Signal Enhancement (IWAENC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iwaenc.2018.8521372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking of Time-Variant Linear Systems: Influence of Group Delay for Different Excitation Signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The curve for step size 0.5 appears to be slightly delayed as a result of the implicit temporal smoothing of the NLMS algorithm for step sizes less than one. Both of these observations match the analyses in [45]. Overall, this result demonstrates that a significant improvement can be achieved with the proposed framework despite the simplifying assumptions about the matrix-valued parameters.…”
Section: A Hrtf Measurement With 37 Channelssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The curve for step size 0.5 appears to be slightly delayed as a result of the implicit temporal smoothing of the NLMS algorithm for step sizes less than one. Both of these observations match the analyses in [45]. Overall, this result demonstrates that a significant improvement can be achieved with the proposed framework despite the simplifying assumptions about the matrix-valued parameters.…”
Section: A Hrtf Measurement With 37 Channelssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The minima occur temporally close to but slightly before the expected position, which is suspected to be a consequence of the head-tracking system's latency and/or mechanical imperfections. The delay in attaining the minimum SD n with the NLMS algorithm is a consequence of the systematic delay of half a period length, i.e., 4800 samples (0.1 s), as also analyzed in [45].…”
Section: B Two-loudspeaker Hrtf Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As expected from [37], the system identification using PSEQ excitation yields lower system distances than using white-noise excitation. In [38] it was analyzed that the estimated coefficients, compared to the true coefficients, appear to be systematically shifted by half the period length. To take this systematic shift of LS/2 samples into account, we compute a modified system distance ( ) comparing h k−LS/2,s to ĥk,s .…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%