2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking statistical learning online: Word segmentation in a target detection task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of signi cant learning effects in the group of children, even when explicit instructions about the to-be-learned regularities were presented before exposure, converge with other works claiming that the 2-AFC task is not well-suited to test SL, particularly in children of this age [see 15,29 ]. As mentioned in the introduction section, the 2-AFC task requires participants to make explicit judgments about regularities that are expected to be acquired implicitly, which might be hard to accomplish by 5-years old children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of signi cant learning effects in the group of children, even when explicit instructions about the to-be-learned regularities were presented before exposure, converge with other works claiming that the 2-AFC task is not well-suited to test SL, particularly in children of this age [see 15,29 ]. As mentioned in the introduction section, the 2-AFC task requires participants to make explicit judgments about regularities that are expected to be acquired implicitly, which might be hard to accomplish by 5-years old children.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…If performance is greater than chance, SL is assumed to have occurred, as only the track of the statistical regularities embedded in the auditory stream presented during the familiarization phase allows a correct 'word' discrimination. Despite the widespread use of this task to test aSL, it is important to emphasize that it relies strongly on explicit judgments, which depend largely on other high-order cognitive skills (e.g., decision-making processes) that could be not fully developed in children of this age [see 29 for similar arguments]. Thus, further research using other tasks and/or methodologies is required to get a deeper understanding of how aSL with linguistic materials might change throughout development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than relying on post-exposure behavioral testing for assessing SL, an alternative approach is to analyze participants' neural activity during the exposure phase and look for evidence that statistical regularities within the stimulus are being picked up. Along these lines, an EEG-based frequency-tagging approach has recently been proposed using a variation of the Artificial Language Paradigm (Buiatti et al 2009;Paller 2017, 2019;Getz et al 2018;Batterink 2020;Choi et al 2020;Elmer et al 2021;Henin et al 2021;Kiai and Melloni 2021;Lukics and Lukács 2021). In this version, syllables are presented at a constant rate (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been increasing focus on online SL tasks, which—in contrast with the offline tasks—measure learning not after, but during the training phase, and have the potential to offer insight into the process of learning (for more details on online SL measures, see Siegelman et al, 2018 ). Online measures seem to provide more sensitive and reliable indices of learning than offline methods (Batterink et al, 2015 ; Lammertink et al, 2019 ; Lukics and Lukács, 2021 ), however currently there are only a few studies of online linguistic SL. In a recent study, Lammertink et al ( 2020a ) have shown with RT measurements in an online target detection task that children with DLD are less effective in learning acoustic non-adjacent dependencies than typically developing (TD) peers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%