2023
DOI: 10.3390/v15040873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking the Genomic Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 for 29 Months in South Korea

Abstract: The pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has continued, with the persistent emergence of variants of concern (VOCs). Therefore, this study aimed to track the genomic evolution of SARS-CoV-2 strains by sequencing the spike protein for 29 months, which accounted for the majority of the COVID-19 pandemic period. A total of 109 swabs from patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection were randomly collected between March 2020 and July 2022. Aft… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the participants, 69 (88.5%) participants experienced breakthrough infections, and nine (11.5%) participants remained infection-naïve. Breakthrough infections were reported between January 2022 and January 2023, coinciding with the Omicron pandemic wave in South Korea [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Since all reported breakthrough infections occurred during the Omicron wave, these events were considered to be Omicron exposures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the participants, 69 (88.5%) participants experienced breakthrough infections, and nine (11.5%) participants remained infection-naïve. Breakthrough infections were reported between January 2022 and January 2023, coinciding with the Omicron pandemic wave in South Korea [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Since all reported breakthrough infections occurred during the Omicron wave, these events were considered to be Omicron exposures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variants of the virus is one of the crucial factors contributing to the false negative results of SARS-CoV-2 detection [ 44 ]. Given that the specimens were collected between August 2021 and May 2022, it could be inferred that the SARS-CoV-2 variants detected in this study were likely the Delta or Omicron (BA.1 and BA.2) variants, which were dominant during that period in Korea [ 45 ]. It is necessary to further compare the performance of ACROSIS according to the SARS-CoV-2 variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third wave spanned from 16 January 2022 to 23 July 2022, during which the Omicron variants, specifically BA.1 and sub-variant BA.2, circulated [ 16 ]. A previous study showed that each of these variants was almost exclusively predominant in South Korea during their respective time periods [ 3 , 17 ]. In this study, each predominant variant is hereafter referred to as wild type (WT), Delta, and Omicron, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While vaccines have proven effective in preventing COVID-19 and reducing the severity of illness, the virus has shown the ability to evolve and give rise to variants of concern (VOC). These variants harbor mutations in the spike protein or other viral components, allowing them to evade the immune response or enhance their transmissibility [ 1 , 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%