2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00410-016-1268-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tracking the timing of subduction and exhumation using 40Ar/39Ar phengite ages in blueschist- and eclogite-facies rocks (Sivrihisar, Turkey)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies demonstrated that the thermal conditions in subduction zones varied through time (e.g., Agard et al, 2009;Plunder et al, 2015;Angiboust et al, 2016), but also along-strike. For instance, in the Franciscan complex of California (Wakabayashi and Dumitru, 2007), in the Sulawesi mélange in SE Asia (Parkinson, 1996) and in the sub-ophiolitic mélanges of Guatemala versus Cuba (Garcia-Casco et al, 2007), (garnet) amphibolites (high-temperature and mid-pressure conditions) are coeval with eclogite or blueschist (low-temperature and high-pressure conditions) along-strike in the same subduction complex. Taking the pressure (simply assumed to represent depth) of metamorphism into account, these may suggest along-strike temperature differences of ca.…”
Section: Oblique Subduction: Present and Past Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These studies demonstrated that the thermal conditions in subduction zones varied through time (e.g., Agard et al, 2009;Plunder et al, 2015;Angiboust et al, 2016), but also along-strike. For instance, in the Franciscan complex of California (Wakabayashi and Dumitru, 2007), in the Sulawesi mélange in SE Asia (Parkinson, 1996) and in the sub-ophiolitic mélanges of Guatemala versus Cuba (Garcia-Casco et al, 2007), (garnet) amphibolites (high-temperature and mid-pressure conditions) are coeval with eclogite or blueschist (low-temperature and high-pressure conditions) along-strike in the same subduction complex. Taking the pressure (simply assumed to represent depth) of metamorphism into account, these may suggest along-strike temperature differences of ca.…”
Section: Oblique Subduction: Present and Past Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both units were metamorphosed around 80-90 Ma (e.g., Whitney and Hamilton, 2004;Fornash et al, 2016;van Hinsbergen et al, 2016;Pourteau et al, 2018) within the same subduction system but under dramatically different metamorphic conditions. In the Tavşanlı zone peak metamorphic conditions were estimated to be around 24 ± 2 kbar and 500 ± 50 • C (Okay et al, 2002;Plunder et al, 2015), whereas peak metamorphism was estimated at around 800 ± 100 • C and 8 ± 1 kbar in the Kırşehir block (Whitney and Hamilton, 2004;Lefebvre et al, 2015).…”
Section: Oblique Subduction: Present and Past Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such systems, 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dating of mica is commonly used to determine the timing of metamorphic cooling following the traditional interpretation of Dodson's diffusion theory (Dodson, 1973), due to the ubiquity of mica and its importance as a geobarometer. However, the concentration of Ar incorporated in, or lost from a grain, is not only dependent on the cooling history and the grain size (as suggested by the Dodson, 1973 formulation) but also on the effectiveness of the grain boundary fluid network in removing Ar (the "openness" of the system) and the variation of the rates of fluid-induced replacement mineral reactions (Cenki-Tok, Darling, Rolland, Dhuime, & Storey, 2014;de Sigoyer et al, 2000;Di Vincenzo, Ghiribelli, Giorgetti, & Palmeri, 2001;Fornash, Cosca, & Whitney, 2016;Mulch & Cosca, 2004;Villa, 2010Villa, , 2016Warren, Hanke, & Kelley, 2012;Warren, Smye, Kelley, & Sherlock, 2012). Therefore, since many tectonic time-scale estimates rely on the interpretation of metamorphic ages (Lanari, Rolland, et al, 2014;Sanchez et al, 2011) and associated cooling rates (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both units were metamorphosed around 80-90 Ma (e.g., Whitney and Hamilton, 2004;Fornash et al, 2016;van Hinsbergen et al, 2016;Pourteau et al, 2018) within the same subduction system but under dramatically different 762 A. Plunder et al: Temperature in oblique subduction metamorphic conditions.…”
Section: Oblique Subduction: Present and Past Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%