18Humans are remarkably capable of adapting their behaviour flexibly based on rapid situational 19 changes: a capacity termed cognitive control. Intuitively, cognitive control is thought to be affected by 20 the state of alertness, for example, when sleepy or drowsy, we feel less capable of adequately 21implementing effortful cognitive tasks. Although scientific investigations have focused on the effects 22 of sleep deprivation and circadian time, little is known about how natural fluctuations in alertness in 23 the regular awake state affect cognitive control. Here we combined a conflict task in the auditory 24 domain with neurodynamics -EEG recordings-to test how neural and behavioural markers of conflict 25processing are affected by fluctuations in arousal. Using a novel computational method, we 26 segregated alert and drowsy trials from a three hour testing session and observed that, although 27 participants were generally slower, the typical slower responses to conflicting information, compared 28to non-conflicting information, was still intact, as well as the effect of previous trials (i.e. conflict 29 adaptation). However, the behaviour was not matched by the typical neural markers of cognitive 30control -local medio-frontal theta-band power changes-, that participants showed during full alertness. 31Instead, a decrease in power of medio-frontal theta was accompanied by an increase in long-range 32 information sharing (connectivity) between brain regions in the same frequency band. The results 33show the resilience of the human cognitive control system when affected by internal fluctuations of 34 our arousal state and suggests a neural compensatory mechanism when the system is under 35physiological pressure due to diminished alertness. 36