2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1807.09299
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tractable Graph Matching via Soft Seeding

Abstract: The graph matching problem aims to discover a latent correspondence between the vertex sets of two observed graphs. This problem has proven to be quite challenging, with few satisfying methods that are computationally tractable and widely applicable. The FAQ algorithm [25] has proven to have good performance on benchmark problems and works with a indefinite relaxation of the problem. Due to the indefinite relaxation, FAQ is not guaranteed to find the global maximum. However, if prior information is known about… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, the error for a local optimum will not necessarily be close to the error for a random permutation, so this result is not directly applicable. Another related result is in [27], which shows that under certain conditions there will be no local optimum which correctly align more than θ( √ n) vertices. This gap in the number of aligned vertices presumably leads to a gap in the objective function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of course, the error for a local optimum will not necessarily be close to the error for a random permutation, so this result is not directly applicable. Another related result is in [27], which shows that under certain conditions there will be no local optimum which correctly align more than θ( √ n) vertices. This gap in the number of aligned vertices presumably leads to a gap in the objective function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we employ a soft seeding approach [27] which uses the prior information to initialize the algorithm but does not insist that the correspondence for seeds be fixed; i.e., if the seeded vertices are [m] in both networks, we initialize the gradient descent graph matching algorithm at I m ⊕ D for suitable D in D n−m . Conversely, in the hard-seeded setting we optimize over Π n−m with the global solution being then of the form I m ⊕P for P ∈ Π n−m .…”
Section: Graph Matching Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above results range from providing theoretic phase transitions on matchability [14,15,38] to providing nearly efficient methods for achieving matchability from an algorithmic perspective [18,4,16,22]. While they have served to establish a novel theoretical understanding of the matchability problem, in each case the transition from matchable to unmatchable graphs is defined in terms of decreasing across-graph correlation and within-graph sparsity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An arguably common perception, as suggested in Zhang (2018) and possibly implicitly in Fang et al (2018), too, is that learning even one seed in the unseeded setting may be hard. But in this paper, we will show that learning a set of "soft" seed nodes, where "soft" has similar meanings as that in (Fang et al, 2018), turns out to be easy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An arguably common perception, as suggested in Zhang (2018) and possibly implicitly in Fang et al (2018), too, is that learning even one seed in the unseeded setting may be hard. But in this paper, we will show that learning a set of "soft" seed nodes, where "soft" has similar meanings as that in (Fang et al, 2018), turns out to be easy. Then under smoothness assumption, the "soft" seeds we select would gradually become "hard" as the bias asymptotically diminishes, and even randomly sampled sets of nodes can serve as quite good seed sets, as long as their numbers slowly grows to infinity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%