2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-003-0443-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traction spica cast for femoral-shaft fractures in children

Abstract: We treated 20 children for an isolated femoral shaft fracture using distal tibial traction incorporated into a spica cast with the knee in full extension. Patients were discharged from the hospital at a mean of 5.1 days following injury. All fractures healed, and there were four minor complications. At a mean follow-up of 35 (13-72) months, all patients were asymptomatic with normal function. All but one fracture healed in acceptable alignment, and there was no clinically significant leg-length discrepancy. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all, 51 articles specifically mentioned the use or non-use traction in their description of spica application and the course of patient care. Of the articles detailing the use of traction, seven specifically had no traction, 12 , 15 , 23 , 25 , 27 , 61 , 103 12 used isolated skin traction, 20 22 , 35 , 36 , 46 , 48 , 53 , 59 , 62 , 68 , 76 and 19 used skeletal traction on some, if not all, of their patients via a Kirschner wire applied to either the distal femur, 10 , 18 , 19 , 24 , 33 , 38 , 41 , 57 , 64 , 67 , 72 , 80 , 94 proximal tibia 13 , 26 , 45 , 97 or unspecified pin location. 52 , 82 Eight retrospective reviews had patients within their cohorts who had received either skin traction or skeletal traction, 17 , 34 , 40 , 56 , 64 , 82 , 86 , 102 but no direct comparison was made between these two treatment options.…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all, 51 articles specifically mentioned the use or non-use traction in their description of spica application and the course of patient care. Of the articles detailing the use of traction, seven specifically had no traction, 12 , 15 , 23 , 25 , 27 , 61 , 103 12 used isolated skin traction, 20 22 , 35 , 36 , 46 , 48 , 53 , 59 , 62 , 68 , 76 and 19 used skeletal traction on some, if not all, of their patients via a Kirschner wire applied to either the distal femur, 10 , 18 , 19 , 24 , 33 , 38 , 41 , 57 , 64 , 67 , 72 , 80 , 94 proximal tibia 13 , 26 , 45 , 97 or unspecified pin location. 52 , 82 Eight retrospective reviews had patients within their cohorts who had received either skin traction or skeletal traction, 17 , 34 , 40 , 56 , 64 , 82 , 86 , 102 but no direct comparison was made between these two treatment options.…”
Section: Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%