Migratory cells use distinct motility modes to navigate different microenvironments, but it is unclear whether these modes rely on the same core set of polarity components. To investigate this, we disrupted Arp2/3 and WAVE complex, which assemble branched actin networks that are essential for neutrophil polarity and motility in standard adherent conditions. Surprisingly, confinement rescues polarity and movement of neutrophils lacking these components, revealing a processive bleb-based protrusion program that is mechanistically distinct from the branched actin-based protrusion program but shares some of the same core components and underlying molecular logic. We further find that the restriction of protrusion growth to one site does not always respond to membrane tension directly, as previously thought, but may rely on closely linked properties such as local membrane curvature. Our work reveals a hidden circuit for neutrophil polarity and indicates that cells have distinct molecular mechanisms for polarization that dominate in different microenvironments.to produce a single protrusion ( Fig. 1A) (Diz-Muñoz et al., 2016;Houk et al., 2012;Keren et al., 2008;Sens and Plastino, 2015).While actin polymerization serves as a key ingredient in generating the positive and negative feedback loops that give rise to polarity, we lack an understanding of how specific types of actin networks provide each kind of feedback. Immune cells assemble multiple actin networks at different subcellular locations that carry out distinct functions to support migration: Arp2/3dependent assembly of branched actin networks at the leading edge contributes to cell guidance/steering and protrusion extension, while actomyosin bundles near the trailing edge provide contractile force to lift the cell rear and squeeze the cell body forward (Lämmermann and Germain, 2014;Moreau et al., 2018). Along with these functional differences, the types of actin networks immune cells and other migratory cells employ for migration vary with microenvironment (Lämmermann and Germain, 2014;Paluch et al., 2016). The role of actin dynamics in migration is complex and likely depends on the type of actin network, its subcellular location, and the extracellular environment. Existing tools to probe the role of actin networks in both the positive and negative feedback loops needed for polarity are fairly crude and have largely been based on pharmacological perturbations that target all actin polymer (Diz-Muñoz et al., 2016;Huang et al., 2013;Inoue and Meyer, 2008;Sasaki et al., 2007;Wang et al., 2002;Weiner et al., 2007;Yang et al., 2016). More surgical experiments are needed to clarify how different subcellular actin networks contribute to polarity generation under different environmental conditions. Figure 1. WAVE complex is required for neutrophil polarity and motility.A) Polarity generation depends on fast-acting, short-range positive feedback and slower-acting, long-range negative feedback. Actin assembly participates in both types of feedback, with its role in negat...