2013
DOI: 10.1111/twec.12099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade Creation and Diversion Effects of Regional Trade Agreements: A Product‐level Analysis

Abstract: 1 See WTO webpage, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/rta_pta_e.htm 2 Baier and Bergstrand (2007) pointed out 'fragility' of estimated treatment effects of RTAs. 3 For example, see Egger (2004) and Carrere (2006) for the application of IV method, Baier and Bergstrand (2007) for fixed effect model, and Egger et al. (2008) for difference-in-difference matching techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
43
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The former refers to a scenario in which trade shifts from inefficient producers to efficient suppliers who are part of the new trade agreement, while the latter refers to a situation in which member countries shift their trade from efficient non-member countries to inefficient member countries, who simply because they are now part of the new agreement, their products would have become cheaper because tariffs are no longer being applied to their products. Thus, trade creation is viewed as welfare enhancing whilst trade diversion is welfare reducing [20][21][22]. According to Viner (1950), the process of trade creation and diversion occurs simultaneously, since several member countries will be trading concurrently with different member and non-member countries [16].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former refers to a scenario in which trade shifts from inefficient producers to efficient suppliers who are part of the new trade agreement, while the latter refers to a situation in which member countries shift their trade from efficient non-member countries to inefficient member countries, who simply because they are now part of the new agreement, their products would have become cheaper because tariffs are no longer being applied to their products. Thus, trade creation is viewed as welfare enhancing whilst trade diversion is welfare reducing [20][21][22]. According to Viner (1950), the process of trade creation and diversion occurs simultaneously, since several member countries will be trading concurrently with different member and non-member countries [16].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Urata, S. and Okabe, M. (2014), using aggregated data in the analysis of a Regional Trade Agreement may not accurately capture its impact to trade since generally the treatment of tariff reduction or elimination differs substantially by product. Hayakawa, K, Ito, T., and Kimura, F. (2016) also used disaggregated tariff line-level trade data in their paper.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Distance ( ) is the geographical distance between the capital city (economy center) of Indonesia and the trade partner countries, either the member countries or nonmember countries of ACFTA, AKFTA, and AIFTA. This variable is used as proxy of the transportation costs (Urata & Okabe, 2010).…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population ( , )is the total population domiciled and settled in a country area. The population is measured with the inhabitant unit, which in this research is the population of the member countries ACFTA, AKFTA, and AIFTA as well as non-member countries (Urata & Okabe, 2010).…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%