Trade in Polarized America: The Border Effect Between Red States and Blue States

Abstract

Political and cultural polarization in the United States is widely discussed, but does it relate to any economic disconnection among states? We estimate the "border" effect between Red and Blue states using the gravity equation with a nonlinear generalized method of moments estimator to simultaneously overcome the problems associated with endogeneity, cross-state price differences, and zero-trade flow. The border effect is robustly confirmed for the 2000s, while not so robustly detected for the 1990s. Notably, in 2007, the border reduces trade between Red and Blue states to approximately 75% of the trade within each set of states. This estimated border effect is much smaller than the United States-Canada national border effect estimated by Anderson and van Wincoop (2003), and by Feenstra (2002), yet is comparable to the border effect that Nitsch and Wolf (2009) find for the former West and East Germanies approximately 10 years after reunification. While the border effect in Germany after reunification is decreasing, the border effect between the Red and Blue states is emerging. We also find the border effect is more significant for consumption, rather than intermediate, goods. The border effect is an important indicator for a potential dismantling of the economic connectivity in the United States. (JEL D72, F10, F15, R1) * We are grateful to the editor Bruce Blonigen, two anonymous referees, Yasushi Asako, Masahiro Endoh, and Giovanni Facchini for their comments and discussions. We also appreciate comments by seminar participants at

Revisiting the importance of border effect in sub‐national regions. Evidence from a quasi‐experimental design

“…Thus, taking into account the research based on trade quantities, significant border effects are found among sub‐national regions in countries such as United States (Wolf ; Ishise and Matsuo ), Canada (Helliwell and Verdier ), Spain (Gil‐Pareja et al ; Requena and Llano ), Brazil (Daumal and Zignago ) and Belgium (Persyn and Torfs ). Bearing in mind the context analysed in this paper, let us briefly comment on the papers by Gil‐Pareja et al () and Requena and Llano ().…”

Haven't they suffered enough? Time to exoneration following wrongful conviction of racially marginalized minority- vs. majority-group members

“…U.S. states are often defined in terms of the political orientation espoused by the majority of their inhabitants, which leads to the state being considered "Republican" or "Democratic" (Ishise and Matsuo, 2015). These political parties differ in the principles and values they espouse.…”

“…Another topic in the field of wrongful convictions is the political character of the U.S. states. U.S. states are often characterized by the political affiliation of their populations, which tend to be majority Democratic or majority Republican (Ishise and Matsuo, 2015). These parties differ in the values they support, such that majority-Democratic states tend to operate under policies that reflect social liberalism and social-democratic economics, while majority-Republican states tend to favor more conservative policies and practices (May and McGarvey, 2017).…”

E pluribus unum? Political fractionalization and deviations from the law of one price in the USA

“…In this environment, it is possible that arbitrage between cities becomes more difficult when one of the producers / retailers is from a strongly Republican city while the other is from a strongly Democrat city, or when one city is culturally "southern" and the other culturally "northern". One paper that does explicitly examine the link between US political fractionalization and trade costs is Ishise and Matsuo (2015), who find a strong negative association between the size of inter-state trade flows and inter-state differences in the level of support for Republican and Democratic candidates. By contrast, our paper examines the association between city-level deviations from LOP and city-level political differences.…”