Trade‐Offs in Conservation 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9781444324907.ch13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade‐Offs between Conservation and Extractive Industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conclusions from these chapters are applicable for other areas with a similar resource conflict. For example, South America is biologically diverse; however, the countries within Latin America have extreme poverty, especially in rural areas, and, often, major industries are based on resource extraction (Pulgar-Vidal et al 2010). South America is home to many medicinal plant species (Roth and Lindorf 2002), some which may be able to be classified as 'cultural keystone species' .…”
Section: Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusions from these chapters are applicable for other areas with a similar resource conflict. For example, South America is biologically diverse; however, the countries within Latin America have extreme poverty, especially in rural areas, and, often, major industries are based on resource extraction (Pulgar-Vidal et al 2010). South America is home to many medicinal plant species (Roth and Lindorf 2002), some which may be able to be classified as 'cultural keystone species' .…”
Section: Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%