Traders’ Engagement with Markets

Abstract

This article focuses upon the construction of wants and the embodying of the market in the work routines of workers on the Swiss foreign exchange market. The authors are particularly concerned with the role of the computer screen within the establishment of postsocial relations around a sense of embodied lack. The screen does not provide access to the market but is the market as an exteriorized assemblage of practices brought together in one place. The screen is the (ontologically liquid) market rather than its representation into which traders immerse themselves. Traders engage with this market in their daily work practices through a constructed sense of lack that requires them to act passionately within the market in order to satisfy the self understood as a structure of wanting. While Knorr Cetina and Bruegger draw on a Lacanian understanding of the self as lack, rather than focus on the formation of direct human social relations around this issue, they look instead at the materiality of lack and its position within the postsocial relations constituted through trading online in the foreign exchange market. Desire is constituted and realized here through the object of the computer screen rather than with other people directly. In this way relations between persons are mediated by real objects that constitute persons virtually.

Algorithms, Governance, and Governmentality

“…Performativity is a relatively well-established tradition in Science and Technology Studies (STS) and is associated with the ''practice turn'' in STS (Jensen 2004). The practice turn is exemplified by the work of Latour and Woolgar (1986), Knorr-Cetina, Schatzki, and von Savigny (2000), Knorr-Cetina and Bruegger (2002), and Law (1991), among many. Not all practice-oriented scholars have foregrounded performativity explicitly.…”

Financialised internationalisation and structural hierarchies: a mixed-method study of exchange rate determination in emerging economies

“…In contrast to most existing studies of FX market actors, which do not discriminate between FX traders which purely operate for clients and "speculative" FX market actors (e.g. Frankel and Froot 1987, Cheung and Chinn 2001, Wansleben 2013, Cetina and Bruegger 2002, Oberlechner, Slunecko and Kronberger 2004, explicit focus was put on operators which take directional ("speculative") FX positions and thus need to form a view about future XR developments. Questions focused on the Brazilian FX market, but were extended to other EEs in the case of offshore respondents.…”

Governing finance in Europe: a centralisation of rule-making?

“…MacKenzie (2004) and Fenton-O'Creevy et al (2007;see also Baker 1984) describe how in the trading pits of Chicago traders originally engaged in face-to-face trading based on mutual trust in a thin market with few players relying on informal rules, which were then gradually formalised. Knorr- Cetina and Bruegger (2002) and MacKenzie (2019) describe how actors thus created rules that defined the conditions for access to the stock market, the roles of diverse actors in the market and the market's operating rules. As markets grew deeper and the number of players and trading options increased, these informal networks broke down.…”