2014 18th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icstcc.2014.6982407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trading optimality for computational feasibility in a sample gathering problem

Abstract: The work focuses on a sample gathering problem where a team of mobile robots has to collect and deposit into a storage facility all samples spread throughout the robotic environment. Recent results propose an optimal and off-line solution for this problem, based on a mixed integer linear programming optimization. However, this optimization may fail when there are many robots and/or samples. To overcome this problem, the current paper first formulates a quadratic programming relaxation that, at a price of obtai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section includes two approaches for overcoming this issue. Section 4.1 reformulates the MILP problem (4) as in [34] and obtains a QP formulation. Section 4.2 proposes an IH algorithm, inspired by allocation ideas from [35].…”
Section: Sub-optimal Planning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This section includes two approaches for overcoming this issue. Section 4.1 reformulates the MILP problem (4) as in [34] and obtains a QP formulation. Section 4.2 proposes an IH algorithm, inspired by allocation ideas from [35].…”
Section: Sub-optimal Planning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, none of the mentioned works contains a directly applicable formulation that yields a solution for our specific problem. This work builds on solutions reported in [33][34][35]. In [33] we constructed a MILP problem that solves the minimum time sample gathering problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations