Tradition (re-)defined: Farm v factory trade-offs in the definition of geographical indications, the case of Three Counties Cider

Oledinma, Akunna; Roper, Stephen

doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.03.005

Cited by 10 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…By offering higher quality products, producers can more easily access markets , which is one of the reasons to adopt GI (Mcmorran et al ., 2015; Egelyng et al ., 2017; Bryła, 2018; Blatnik and Bojnec, 2020; Oledinma and Roper, 2021). Traversac et al .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lack of information is another recurrent problem mentioned in the literature. Many producers do not know what a GI is or do not correctly understand the way it works, as well as the benefits it can offer (Mancini, 2013; Mesić et al ., 2017; Bustamante, 2019; Fraga et al ., 2019; Bashir, 2020; Blakeney et al ., 2020; Oledinma and Roper, 2021). In addition to affecting the access of producers to the GI, lack of information also hinders the GI establishment process (Galtier et al ., 2013; Quiñones-Ruiz et al ., 2017; Blakeney et al ., 2020).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Zito (2019), for example, explains that, due to some problems in the Australian legislation, regional names are used in products that have no connection with the territory. Problems in dealing with free riders related to legislation and policies were also identified by Traversac et al (2011) in a wine GI in France, and by Oledinma and Roper (2021) in a cider GI from the United Kingdom. The sale of counterfeit products can lead to income losses for GI producers (Bashir, 2020).…”

Section: Barriers Of Gi To Producersmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…By offering higher quality products, producers can more easily access markets, which is one of the reasons to adopt GI (Mcmorran et al, 2015;Egelyng et al, 2017;Bryła, 2018;Blatnik and Bojnec, 2020;Oledinma and Roper, 2021). Traversac et al (2011) highlighted, in their article that GI wines are highly valued in the final market, which allows higher prices and faster sales.…”

Section: Benefits Of Gi To Producersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some articles demonstrate that the GI's rules hinder the ability of producers to modernize and adapt to new markets (Bowen and De Master, 2011;Galtier et al, 2013;Mancini, 2013;Niederle and Gelain, 2013;Durand and Fournier, 2017). The attempt to create rules that are too broad to favor the interests of all agents, or the most powerful agents can lead to weak institutions that fail to protect the product's connection with the terroir, in addition to making it difficult for producers to access the value created in the territory (Bowen, 2012;Mancini, 2013;Neilson et al, 2018;Oledinma and Roper, 2021). Problems related to the institutional environment and GI's rule were also mentioned by Conneely and Mahon (2015), Zhao et al, (2014), andHoang et al (2020).…”

Section: Barriers Of Gi To Producersmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The benefits and barriers of geographical indications to producers: A review

Cardoso

Lourenzani

Caldas

et al. 2022

Renew. Agric. Food Syst.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consumers are increasingly demanding information regarding the characteristics of products, their place of origin and methods of production. A Geographical Indication (GI) can be understood as a way to meet these demands, as it protects the origin of the product, as well as its characteristics. In addition to contributing to territorial development, GI signs have the potential to add value to products and help producers to become more competitive. However, some authors argue that there are barriers that can prevent the benefits of GI from reaching producers. Therefore, this article aims to identify the barriers and benefits of GI for producers. To reach this end, a Systematic Literature Review was carried out. As a result, it was observed that among the main benefits offered by the GI are higher prices, access to markets and preservation of cultural identity. Regarding the challenges, it was highlighted the existence of inefficient institutions, organizational problems, power asymmetry and appropriation of value by the most powerful agents of the supply chain. To conclude, this paper shows that the difficulties and benefits of GI to producers are not absolute and vary from region to region. In this sense, further research on the impact of GI, especially in developing countries, is necessary. The results here presented may be used as a base for future research that search to identify the importance of GI for producers and may also contribute to the development of actions or public policies related to GI.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%