Traditional and elastic resistance training enhances functionality and lipid profile in the elderly

Silva, Bruna Spolador de Alencar; Lira, Fábio Santos; Freitas, Marcelo Conrado de; Uzeloto, Juliana Souza; Santos, Vanessa Ribeiro dos; Freire, Ana Paula Coelho Figueira; Bertolini, Giovana Navarro

doi:10.1016/j.exger.2020.110921

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[ 25 ] The American Heart Association and the American College of Sports Medicine jointly issued a Fitness Guideline, pointing out that the older adults aged over 65 years should have 8 to 10 different kinds of resistance training, such as dumbbell, elastic band exercise, roller skates and binding sandbag, for at least 2 to 3 times a week [ 26 ] The age of intervention population in these studies ranged from 60 to 90 years, including not only the healthy older adults, but also those with underlying diseases, such as diabetes, [ 27 ] dementia, [ 28 ] hypertension, [ 29 ] osteoporosis, [ 30 ] mobility disorder or disability, [ 31 ] and the training effect was also relatively comprehensive including long-term body changes and short-term changes within 30 minutes such as blood glucose, blood pressure and heart rate, etc. [ 32 ] In China, aerobic exercise is considered the major method of exercise for the older adults; whereas, resistance exercise has mainly focused on theoretical researches but less practical studies with scientific guidance. [ 33 , 34 ] The resistance exercise with the elastic ball and elastic band used in this study is a kind of training method to overcome resistance to complete muscle contraction and enhance motor functions of the muscles, joints, and ligaments along with the change in body shape of patients.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of resistance exercise program on muscle strength, cardiopulmonary function and glycolipid metabolism of bedridden population aged 80 years and above: A randomized controlled trial

Wang,

Huo,

Wang

et al. 2024

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a resistance exercise program in the bedridden older adults in China. Methods: The patients aged 80 years and above with stable diseases were randomly divided into control group (receiving routine treatment and nursing) and training group (receiving the elastic ball and elastic band training applied for 55 minutes, 3 times a week during 6 months). Results: A total of 59 patients (control group: 30; training groups: 29) completed the study. In terms of muscle strength, the patients of the training group had better grip strength and supine leg lifts and 30-s sit-to-stand actions. In terms of cardiopulmonary function and glycolipid metabolism, the patients in the training groups had better lung capacity and high-density lipoprotein. Conclusion: The low-load and low-intensity resistance training may effectively improve not only the muscle strength of the bedridden older adults, but also the lung function and blood lipid metabolism.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of resistance exercise program on muscle strength, cardiopulmonary function and glycolipid metabolism of bedridden population aged 80 years and above: A randomized controlled trial

Wang,

Huo,

Wang

et al. 2024

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…22,23,25 Tanto os pesos livres quanto as máquinas se mostraram eficientes para gerar incremento na força de preensão manual pós treinamento para idosos. 23,25,[30][31][32][33] Porém, não foi encontrada na literatura disponível uma pesquisa de revisão sistemática e metanálise que verificou se algum destes treinamentos de força (pesos livres ou máquinas) é melhor para a força de preensão manual em comparação ao outro em indivíduos idosos.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Força De Preensão Manual Não Difere Entre Pesos Livres Ou Máquinas Em Idosos: Metanálise

Moutinho Bernardo de Moraes,

Pasqualotti,

Sbardelotto

2023

Rev Bras Med Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introdução: O envelhecimento pode acarretar níveis baixos de força muscular, que são relacionados com o surgimento de doenças, limitações físicas e o aumento de morte prematura em idosos. O teste de força de preensão manual é utilizado para mensurar a força muscular, e os treinamentos de força com pesos livres ou máquinas, são eficientes para aumentar este desfecho. Entretanto, estes equipamentos diferem em aparência, biomecânica e estratégia de seleção dentro de uma periodização, o que acaba gerando questionamentos na comunidade científica, a respeito de qual seja mais eficiente para diferentes desfechos. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar se existe diferença significativa na força de preensão manual em treinamentos de força que utilizaram pesos livres ou máquinas em indivíduos idosos através de uma revisão sistemática e metanálise. Métodos: Esta pesquisa seguiu os protocolos da Cochrane e PRISMA. A busca na literatura foi realizada nas bases de dados eletrônicas Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science e Science Direct, e foram realizadas buscas nas referências de estudos já publicados sobre o assunto. Os critérios de elegibilidade incluíram: artigos completos de ensaios clínicos em inglês com indivíduos idosos aptos para a prática de exercícios físicos; intervenções com treinamentos de força que compararam pesos livres com máquinas; e avaliação da força de preensão manual pré e pós treinamento. Resultados: De 436 estudos recuperados das bases de dados, dois estudos preencheram os critérios de inclusão para a realização da revisão sistemática e metanálise. A análise estatística não mostrou diferença significativa entre os grupos para a força de preensão manual (P = 0,56). Não houve heterogeneidade entre os estudos (P = 1,00). Conclusão: A conclusão deste estudo foi que não houve diferença significativa na força de preensão manual entre treinamentos de força que utilizaram pesos livres ou máquinas em indivíduos idosos.

show abstract

“…22,23,25 Both free weights and machines have been shown to be efficient in generating an increase in handgrip strength for the elderly after training. 23,25,[30][31][32][33] However, no systematic review or meta-analysis was found in the available literature to verify whether either of these strength training methods (free weights or machines) is better for handgrip strength than the other in elderly individuals.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Grip Strength Does Not Differ Between Free Weights or Machines in Older Adults: Meta-Analysis

Moutinho Bernardo de Moraes,

Pasqualotti,

Sbardelotto

2023

Rev Bras Med Esporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The aging can lead to low levels of muscle strength, related to the emergence of diseases, physical limitations and an increase in premature death in the elderly. The handgrip strength test is a parameter to measure muscle strength, and strength training with free weights or machines are efficient to increase this outcome. However, these equipments differ in appearance, biomechanics and selection strategy within a periodization, which ends up generating questions in the scientific community regarding which one is more efficient for the outcomes that want to meansure. Objective: This study aimed to compare whether there is a significant difference in handgrip strength in strength training that used free weights or machines in elderly individuals through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: This research followed the protocols and fulfilled all the requirements of Cochrane and The PRISMA Statement. The literature search was performed in the electronic databases Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Science Direct, and searches were performed in the references of studies already published on the subject. Eligibility criteria included: full articles of clinical trials in English with elderly individuals able to practice physical exercises; interventions with strength training that compared free weights with machines; and assessment of pre- and post-training handgrip strength. Results: A total of 436 studies retrieved from the databases, two studies met the inclusion criteria for performing the systematic review and meta-analysis. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between groups for handgrip strength (P = 0,56). There was no heterogeneity between the studies (P = 1,00). Conclusion: The conclusion of this study was that there was no significant difference in handgrip strength between strength training using free weights or machines in elderly. Level of Evidence I; Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

show abstract

Traditional and elastic resistance training enhances functionality and lipid profile in the elderly

Cited by 3 publications

References 45 publications

Impact of resistance exercise program on muscle strength, cardiopulmonary function and glycolipid metabolism of bedridden population aged 80 years and above: A randomized controlled trial

Impact of resistance exercise program on muscle strength, cardiopulmonary function and glycolipid metabolism of bedridden population aged 80 years and above: A randomized controlled trial

Força De Preensão Manual Não Difere Entre Pesos Livres Ou Máquinas Em Idosos: Metanálise

Grip Strength Does Not Differ Between Free Weights or Machines in Older Adults: Meta-Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About