2014
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditional and innovative echocardiographic parameters for the analysis of right ventricular performance in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
140
1
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
140
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional easy-to-measure RV function parameters such as TAPSE and tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TASV) confirmed a good correlation with PASP in both the echocardiography and catheterized patient groups of the present study. This is also consistent with results of a recent study by Focardi et alcomparing both conventional (TAPSE,TASV, FAC) and novel (RV strain) parameters with CMR, albeit in non-SSc patients [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Conventional easy-to-measure RV function parameters such as TAPSE and tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TASV) confirmed a good correlation with PASP in both the echocardiography and catheterized patient groups of the present study. This is also consistent with results of a recent study by Focardi et alcomparing both conventional (TAPSE,TASV, FAC) and novel (RV strain) parameters with CMR, albeit in non-SSc patients [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a (partial) ARVD/C cohort, mean RV free wall peak strain showed the strongest correlation with MRI obtained RVEF compared to other conventional 2D systolic parameters [48]. Several studies suggest an important role of exercise in the pathogenesis of ARVD/C [49,50].…”
Section: Systolic Deformationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[1618] On the other hand, limitations of TAPSE and S’ are acknowledged in consensus ASE guidelines [8], and these indices have been shown to yield limited sensitivity and predictive value in heart failure cohorts receiving ventricular assist devices and undergoing cardiac surgery. [1922] Our study did not directly test echo indices in relation to outcomes, but instead to a CMR surrogate of RVEF which has itself been validated as a prognostic index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%