2021
DOI: 10.28995/2075-7182-2021-20-246-258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Argumentation Mining in Russian Texts

Abstract: Argumentation mining is a field of computational linguistics that is devoted to extracting from texts and classifying arguments and relations between them, as well as constructing an argumentative structure. A significant obstacle to research in this area for the Russian language is the lack of annotated Russian-language text corpora. This article explores the possibility of improving the quality of argumentation mining using the extension of the Russian-language version of the Argumentative Microtext Corpus (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(Fishcheva and Kotelnikov, 2019) translated into Russian and researched the English language Argumentative Microtext Corpus (ArgMicro) (Peldszus and Stede, 2015;Skeppstedt et al, 2018). In (Fishcheva et al, 2021) this corpus was expanded with machine translation of the Persuasive Essays Corpus (PersEssays) (Stab and Gurevych, 2014). XGBoost and BERT were applied to classify "for"/"against" premises.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation

RuArg-2022: Argument Mining Evaluation

Kotelnikov,
Loukachevitch,
Nikishina
et al. 2022
Preprint
“…(Fishcheva and Kotelnikov, 2019) translated into Russian and researched the English language Argumentative Microtext Corpus (ArgMicro) (Peldszus and Stede, 2015;Skeppstedt et al, 2018). In (Fishcheva et al, 2021) this corpus was expanded with machine translation of the Persuasive Essays Corpus (PersEssays) (Stab and Gurevych, 2014). XGBoost and BERT were applied to classify "for"/"against" premises.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stance or premise label was chosen as the one where the corresponding input example had the maximum softmax output. sevastyanm (vyatsu) This participant utilized pre-trained ruRoberta-large language model 12 which was trained on additional data obtained from "PersEssays Russian" and "ArgMicro Russian" datasets (Fishcheva et al, 2021) with similar annotation schemes. Both datasets were united by argumentative discourse units and used to train model to solve 4-class classification problem.…”
Section: Participating Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%

RuArg-2022: Argument Mining Evaluation

Kotelnikov,
Loukachevitch,
Nikishina
et al. 2022
Preprint
“…The first annotated corpus for the Russian language (Fishcheva and Kotelnikov, 2019) was created based on the translation of the English language Argumentative Microtext Corpus (ArgMicro) (Peldszus and Stede, 2015;. It was then expanded with machine translation of the Persuasive Essays Corpus (PersEssays) (Stab and Gurevych, 2014) and a Joint Argument Annotation Scheme was proposed (Fishcheva et al, 2021). By using XGBoost and BERT, the authors were able to improve the results of automatic classification of "for" / "against" premises.…”
Section: Argumentation Mining In Russianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our work, to the best of our knowledge, the problem of generating argumentative texts in Russian is being investigated for the first time. We are expanding the Russian-language corpus from (Fishcheva et al, 2021) by translating the UKP Sentential Argument Mining Corpus (UKP Sentential) (Stab et al, 2018). Based on the extended corpus, we train RuBERT model, which we then use to annotate sentences of the economic news corpus.…”
Section: Argumentation Mining In Russianmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation