2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditional risk-sharing arrangements and informal social insurance in Eritrea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preker et al (2002) provide evidence from the developing world and suggest that such schemes may even be inclusive of the poor who are in general socially excluded. Habtom and Ruys (2007), using data from Eritrea, report evidence for the importance informal insurance schemes in providing modern health services where free public health services and private insurance are unavailable. Thus, there is room for policy in terms of enhancing the sustainability of these financing arrangements in the context of health expenditures.…”
Section: Patients' Hospital Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preker et al (2002) provide evidence from the developing world and suggest that such schemes may even be inclusive of the poor who are in general socially excluded. Habtom and Ruys (2007), using data from Eritrea, report evidence for the importance informal insurance schemes in providing modern health services where free public health services and private insurance are unavailable. Thus, there is room for policy in terms of enhancing the sustainability of these financing arrangements in the context of health expenditures.…”
Section: Patients' Hospital Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Health insurance enrolment in LMICs tends to be inequitable as most schemes favour the few well off over the many poor, the vulnerable and low‐income earners (Yazbeck ). Yet these groups of people face a disproportionate share of the disease burden and need financial protection (Habtom & Ruys ). Even when attempts are made to provide coverage for vulnerable groups, maintaining their membership becomes problematic as they are likely to drop out due to problems associated with membership renewal (De Allegri et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these countries the particular groups at risk are children, the elderly, women, low-income populations, the rural population, racial or ethnic minorities and immigrants, all of whom are at higher risk of health problems and are more likely to be uninsured. Some researchers have identified that low-income and vulnerable groups are the most likely not to be covered yet are most in need of access to health care and financial protection (Gilson 2000; Habtom 2007; Hsiao 2007). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%