2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10781-005-5739-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditionalism and Innovation: Philosophy, Exegesis, and Intellectual History in Jñānaśrīmitra’s Apohaprakaraṇa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though Ratnakīrti generally follows the AP, often verbatim, his rearrangement, presentation, and occasional clarification of its material constitutes a separate and coherent restatement of the apoha theory well worth its own investigation. 14 Notwithstanding the excellent translation and useful comments in McCrea andPatil 2010, Akamatsu 1983 was still found to be indispensable for the more historically oriented study here.…”
Section: Previous Scholarship On Ratnakīrtimentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though Ratnakīrti generally follows the AP, often verbatim, his rearrangement, presentation, and occasional clarification of its material constitutes a separate and coherent restatement of the apoha theory well worth its own investigation. 14 Notwithstanding the excellent translation and useful comments in McCrea andPatil 2010, Akamatsu 1983 was still found to be indispensable for the more historically oriented study here.…”
Section: Previous Scholarship On Ratnakīrtimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this example, the explanation given with the sentences tathā hi vicitrānādivāsanāvaśāt ... niyatatvāt corresponds nearly verbatim to a passage from the Sākārasiddhiśāstra (henceforth SāSiŚā), SāSiŚā 393,10-14. Whereas in this case it is difficult to judge whether the argument has been repurposed by Ratnakīrti because the source text, the SāSiŚā, is not well understood, for the AS the situation is usually clearer, because Akamatsu 1983 andMcCrea andPatil 2010 provide a good understanding of the AS's basis, the AP.…”
Section: Ratnakīrti's Stylementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, the last few years have seen plenty of progress on the concept of determination, or adhyavasāya. The most useful publications for our purposes are McCrea and Patil (2006), which focuses on Jñānaśrīmitra's view on determination and its philosophical history, and Patil (2009, pp. 250-288), which analyzes Ratnakīrti's epistemology very closely.…”
Section: Determination and Forms In The Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covertly, Ratnakīrti criticizes a few things about Dharmottara's apoha theory Akamatsu (1986). is the most detailed treatment of differences between Dharmottara and Ratnakīrti McCrea and Patil (2006). cover the relation between Dharmakīrti, Dharmottara and Jñānaśrīmitra.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…).39 For more on this, seeMcCrea and Patil (2006), especially pp. 307-331.40 NB p. 80: grāhyād* arthād utpattāv apy asya jñānasyâsti kaścid avaśyakarttavyah : prāpakavyāpāro[,] yena kr : tenârthah : prāpito bhavati.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%