2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782013005000150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tradução e validação para a língua portuguesa da escala de neofobia em relação à tecnologia de alimentos: food technology neophobia scale

Abstract: RESUMO As indústrias de alimentos vêm inovando e desenvolvendo novos produtos e processamentos, e os consumidores estão mais conscientes e preocupados em relação às novas tecnologias alimentares, o que pode infl uenciar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For each of the sets, they had to indicate the one they would choose. Then, participants were asked to complete the Portuguese version of the FTNS (Cox & Evans, ), which has already been validated with Brazilian consumers (Vidigal et al , ). They were asked to indicate their degree of agreement with the 13 statements of the scale using 7‐point likert scales (1: strongly disagree, 7: strongly agree) (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each of the sets, they had to indicate the one they would choose. Then, participants were asked to complete the Portuguese version of the FTNS (Cox & Evans, ), which has already been validated with Brazilian consumers (Vidigal et al , ). They were asked to indicate their degree of agreement with the 13 statements of the scale using 7‐point likert scales (1: strongly disagree, 7: strongly agree) (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original version (in English) of the instrument developed by Cox and Evans (2008) was constructed in the form of a questionnaire containing 13 items (Table 1), which are presented in the form of statements in which the respondent should express his/her opinion using the concordance scale (7-point scale anchored at the extremes). This questionnaire was translated and validated for the Portuguese language by Vidigal et al (2014), using the backtranslation technique (Prieto, 1992). Three bilingual translators translated all original items of the FTNS (Cox & Evans, 2008), from English to Portuguese.…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first FA dimension was correlated with 1-5 and 9-12 items of the neophobia questionnaire for both groups of consumers. Therefore, consumers believe that "new technologies are necessary" (items 1-5 and 12), healthier options (item 7), and without risk (items 9-11) [33]. Furthermore, the second FA was correlated with 6-8 items of the neophobia questionnaire for both groups of consumers.…”
Section: Food Neophobia Scale and Attributes Important For Acceptancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…After the packaging evaluation, the respondents were asked to answer the Food Technology Neophobia scale questions using a 7-point Likert scale (1 = totally disagree; 4 = neither agree nor disagree; 7 = totally agree) (Table 2). This scale evaluates the new food openness and consists of thirteen (n = 13) sentences [10,32,33]. Furthermore, the importance of attributes of probiotic fermented beverages for consumer acceptance was evaluated using a 7-point Likert scale (1 = not important; 7 = very important) [9].…”
Section: Recruitment Of Consumers and Questionnaire Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%