2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45412-8_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic Handling in AQUILA QoS IP Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A differentiated services architecture needs to be supported by an adequate traffic classification strategy [10,11]. As initial policy, we treat TCP and UDP traffic separately, being UDP traffic further divided according to the applications QoS requirements stringiness.…”
Section: Definition Of Service Classes and Slsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A differentiated services architecture needs to be supported by an adequate traffic classification strategy [10,11]. As initial policy, we treat TCP and UDP traffic separately, being UDP traffic further divided according to the applications QoS requirements stringiness.…”
Section: Definition Of Service Classes and Slsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the criteria suggest distinct classes for UDP and TCP traffic so that non-reactive and reactive applications do not compete for the same resources. Some go further suggesting that the duration of flows, the transmission rate and packet size characteristics should also be considered [9]. A classification method based on QoS application requirements such as delay or loss sensitivity is also proposed [10].…”
Section: Traffic Classification Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) AC Decision Algorithms: In any AC strategy the admission criterion plays a crucial role as regards service guarantees and network efficiency. There are more or less conservative proposals [18], which consider the estimation and control of parameters such as available bandwidth, delay, loss or ECN marks. Most of AC approaches only control the available bandwidth or capacity, comparing it with the flow requested rates.…”
Section: A Model Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%