2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic noise spectrum analysis: Dynamic modeling vs. experimental observations

Abstract: This paper compares two traffic representations for the assessment of urban noise frequency spectrum: (i) a static one, based on mean vehicle speeds and flow rates, (ii) a dynamic one, which considers vehicle interactions along the network. The two representations are compared on their suitability to match real on-field noise levels, recorded on a three lane quite busy street. Representation (i) fails in reproducing spectra envelopes that correspond to this site. In particular, it underestimates low frequencie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
58
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These models predict the instantaneous contribution of single vehicles to the sound level at a receiver location over time, and account for dynamic effects of vehicular traffic, such as the excess noise emission due to acceleration of vehicles (although limitations still exist because of the relative scarcity of measurement data on emissions during acceleration, and because of the limited accuracy of the estimated traffic variables, in particular acceleration, within dynamic traffic models). This dynamic approach can be used to estimate more advanced indicators, such as indicators that assess the impact of traffic light cycles [26][27][28] or indicators that assess the temporal structure of the sound [29]. Clearly, this…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models predict the instantaneous contribution of single vehicles to the sound level at a receiver location over time, and account for dynamic effects of vehicular traffic, such as the excess noise emission due to acceleration of vehicles (although limitations still exist because of the relative scarcity of measurement data on emissions during acceleration, and because of the limited accuracy of the estimated traffic variables, in particular acceleration, within dynamic traffic models). This dynamic approach can be used to estimate more advanced indicators, such as indicators that assess the impact of traffic light cycles [26][27][28] or indicators that assess the temporal structure of the sound [29]. Clearly, this…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher levels within the frequency range [400, 3000] Hz may have been judged unpleasant by participants. These levels are likely to be linked to higher vehicle speeds [22] for the crossroads with traffic lights than for the roundabout, for which vehicles have to slow down when approaching. levels around 16 kHz indicate the presence of braking noise with a shrill character [10], which may have been judged negatively by participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such low frequency waves can be practically measured in urban environments as being produced by either heavy industrial machineries, intense impulse noise, or, for a part, the traffic noise, 9,10 and they may propagate over long distances, compared with higher frequency waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%