“…If co‐production is possible amid the risk governance logics of the epidemiological clinic—in discussions about what risks and what interventions to minimise those risks are acceptable—then clearly the clinical relationship must be at the heart of it. However, being accountable for risk while also providing patient‐centred care is by no means straightforward (Iversen, Broström, & Ulander, ), and the power and status differentials between worker and patient may play a role. For instance, different types of professionals, para‐professionals, or lay health workers may be more or less invested in trusting their patients as decision makers (Hall, Tomkinson, & Klein, ), and the social class and gender of practitioners and those they are working with may affect the relationship via the “differing potential for [deeper] ‘we‐relationships’ to be formed and via the generalizing and stereotyped knowledge applied in their absence” (Veltkamp & Brown, , p. 1297).…”