Traffic (safety) culture and alcohol use: cultural patterns in the light of results of the SARTRE 4 study

Abstract

Purpose Culture is put centre stage not only in contemporary social science, but also in safety research. In this paper we ask whether a safety culture exists in contemporary traffic systems across Europe and how it might look like by constructing a conceptual scheme of traffic safety culture with reference to Talcott Parsons' theory of social action. We refer to cultural patterns of alcohol use as alcohol is one of the most important safety issues alongside with speeding and fatigue. Culture is internalised by car drivers in terms of attitudes which organise motivational processes. Cognitive, emotional (cathectic) and evaluative attitudes can be distinguished. Methods We apply this scheme to data that were collected in the course of the SARTRE 4 survey in which attitudes and opinions concerning road safety and accident causation in 18 European countries were measured. Countries differ with reference to cognitive, emotional and moral dimensions. Results The results are organised in a comprehensive scheme of emotional and moral cultural orientations which is by far not complete, but which shall guide analysis in future research. Conclusions The analysis does not dig deeply into the national cultural systems of road traffic at a national level, but it is sufficiently clear in order to distinguish different configurations of cultural patterns along the three dimensions of cognition, emotion and morality. Understanding these dimensions is useful in order to construct symbolic or cultural leverages (e.g. media campaigns) in order to make our streets safer.

Effects of Human-Centered Factors on Crash Injury Severities

“…The analyses also showed that focusing education efforts on specific driver types (i.e., demographic groups) may also be effective in reducing serious crashes in Alabama. And finally, some of the behaviors may be positively impacted with increased or enhanced enforcement [e.g., [1,14,89]]. …”

“…Societal norms and cultural practices, such as adherence to traffic rules and regulations, on the other hand also play important roles in shaping driver attitudes and beliefs. These have impacts on driving styles and can affect traffic safety [9][10][11][12][13][14]. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) observed that cultural differences and sensitivities correlate with motor vehicle fatality and injury rates.…”

Exploring the influencing factors of public traffic safety awareness in China

“…Naevestad et al (2012) reported several studies on professional drivers and identified the relationship between traffic climate and traffic-related variables. Many studies have also confirmed the important role of traffic climate in traffic-related behaviour from different perspectives (Guggenheim and Taubman-Ben-Ari 2015;Lee et al 2015;Naevestad et al 2015;Schlembach et al 2016).…”

Traffic safety climate factors in explaining driving behaviours and traffic crash involvement: comparative study among male and female drivers

“…Researchers in the domain of traffic safety have also acknowledged the importance of applying TSC factors in predicting driving-related behaviours (Lee et al, 2016;Schlembach et al, 2016) and crash involvement (Özkan & Lajunen, 2015) as depicted in Figure 1. However, few studies have explored the relationship between traffic safety climate and driving behaviour as well as crash involvement (Chu et al, 2019;Gehlert et al 2014;.…”